Mida has its very own archetype, there are no comparable legendary versions....
It's also not OP in any way shape or form....
English
-
MIDA is a four headshot archetype scout rifle. Break it down by lethality (ROF and damage) and you have definitive archetypes with only slight deviation from weapon to weapon.
-
Fire rate and impact, that's what makes specific gun archetypes..... Hand cannons have three archetypes, pulse rifles have four, scouts have four including the unique mida, auto rifles have three.....
-
Keep making assertions without backing them up. It totally convinced me of the legitimacy of your opinion. No, really.
-
Editado por Mickey Padge: 7/29/2016 10:49:35 PMThese are the facts of the weapons archetype, fire rate and impacts are stats, not sure even what your point is... lol
-
High rof, scopes similar, Mida does slightly more damage, how is that not comparable? just compared it.
-
It's not the same archetype, it's a primary scout rifle, everything else is different lol
-
That whole "archetype" classification is ridiculous, the guns are comparable if only slight differences between rof, damage, stability, etc exist. Look at their stats, shoot them both, they are similar, I have them both, use them both. Arbitrary classifications dont change that.
-
Comparable, meaning same fire rate and damage..... Otherwise by your definition all guns are comparable simply because they fire bullets..... There are no other legendary guns sharing the mida archetype, zero, zilch, nada. It is unique....
-
Satirenne rapier?
-
Mid impact like vision of confluence, one second ttk....
-
Editado por $Three: 7/29/2016 10:49:39 PMMIDA ( old source) is .9 One tenth of a second does not a new archetype make - M. Archer
-
Of course it does lol
-
All guns ARE comparable, and you're right, because they all shoot the same type of projectile. Apples compare quite easily with other apples.
-
Lol, actually I defined it as slight differences, by your definition guns are only similar if they are the exact same.
-
[quote]Lol, actually I defined it as slight differences, by your definition guns are only similar if they are the exact same.[/quote] So if it's different, then it isn't comparable lol I didn't say similar did I.....
-
Comparable and similar are synonyms bro, work on that vocab before arguing semantics. They are similar/comparable.
-
Look at my original post..... "Mida has its very own archetype, there are no comparable legendary versions...." That makes perfect sense, there are no legendary versions of mida, none, see how I say it has its very own archetype? If you can't grasp that basic post, that's not my fault.... If you say the faster fire rate weapon is comparable to the mida archetype, like I originally posted, you'd be wrong....
-
No, what your original post implies is that no legendary version is comparable, which is false, if you said there is no legendary Mida, then that would be correct, poor word choice on your part.
-
Editado por Mickey Padge: 7/29/2016 11:13:27 PMNope, you keep missing the "archetype" part of my post, deliberately I would suggest.... Comparable archetype.... Comparable can be used as follows: equal to, in the same class as, in the same league as, of the same standard..... Mida fires at its very own unique fire rate and causes it's very own unique damage numbers, unlike any legendary in the game.... If you can't grasp this concept and continue to chase semantics for your argument, you've lost... Unless you're trying to be deliberately obtuse.....
-
Already addressed the whole archetype thing, you cannot pick and choose small parts of a whole argument and settle on what you think is a point. Im done anyhow, this has stretched on enough I think.
-
Archetype is based on the exact fire rate and impact stats bungie provided, simple as that.....
-
Inward Lamp is very comparable.
-
No its not lol