{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/6/2016 9:43:44 AM
8
You are comparing a year 1 weapon with year 2 weapons. Ofcourse for damage the year 2 weapons are going to win.
Just stop dude. You just went full retard.
English
-
Never go full retard man
-
Lmao nah I think your the full retard here bub
-
if you compare damage whilst on patrol then all weapons are balanced to year 1 levels. a ghorn will take a taken ultra down quicker than anything else whilst on patrol. similarly my 170 vision of confluence does the same damage as my 335 tlaloc whilst in year 1 content. you should do your homework before calling other people retarded.
-
OP is not simply comparing Year 2 weapons to Year 1 weapons. He is saying that there are weapons that deal massive damage now, like the Raze Lighter, just like Gjallarhorn dealt massive damage in Year 1. Don't call people retarded if you're just going to make a fool of yourself.
-
I think you're the retard here.
-
Apparently comparing weapons makes you retarded
-
When comparing it to a year 1 weapon yeah it is. Unless it gets a year 2 version, you cant compare it to ghorn for the reason that ghorn havent gotten a change to do damage year 2 wise. Its damage is capped at year 1 stats, while swords are fully year 2. There is no year 1 version of swords to even check damage numbers with them to see where the cap is and the difference year 2 stats have. For that reason its stupid to compare ghorn with swords.
-
Read my other reply.
