{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Editado por TrixRidiculous:
8/28/2015 6:51:07 PM
408
Should the triumphs have included the lighthouse?
Not meant to be an elitist thread. Just wondering people's opinions. I think seeing the lighthouse was a legitimate endgame activity. More then getting golden chests... just a thought
Edit: bunch of interesting opinions. Some people seem like elitists, others seem like they just never want to play pvp which is a fine argument. It's not changing now so it doesn't actually matter. Personally I just see it as a critical part of completing everything year 1 had to offer, that's all.
English
#Destiny
-
Nah, the lighthouse already has enough rewards. They have their own emblem, weapons, and grimoire. And yes, I do realize that the raids have their own emblem, weapons, and grimoire.
-
It's a little to late for that
-
-
No, I think a common misconception about this emblem is that it should be quite difficult when in reality it's a status symbol to show you're a true player. Beating all end game activities on hard and the pvp challenges show you're a true all around player. Adding a flawless trials is overboard just like adding flawless raider would be.
-
No because you already get an emblem for going flawless. I'm glad there's only one PvP requirement to get Triumphs as many of us don't really like PvP. I myself only play during Iron Banana and haven't even played that in months because I have all the weapons and a lot of the armor already. I much prefer PvE and have only played five, maybe 10 ToO matches ever.
-
Nah because not everyone enjoys/is good at crucible. I know I'm not.
-
16 RespuestasMaybe not the lighthouse....But, maybe something like 50,000 or 100,000 medal score. Cuz how it is now, there's [u][i] nothing[/i][/u] for pvp in the triumphs.
-
No! Triumphs was just a fun thing they did on Bungie day... The lighthouse is so dumb anyway. Who tf cares about ToO?! And before you say "oh you're just bad scrub, git gud", I am good. I'm in the top 7%
-
-
-
I could understand 9 wins, but not flawless. The lag and cheater problems are to bad to make flawless a requirement.
-
Yes it should have.
-
-
15 RespuestasI don't think so. Flawless Raider wasn't a requirement. So a flawless pvp endgame activity shouldn't be either.
-
-
-
No...triumphs are meant to show that you participated in year one, not was elite during it.
-
it's trying to communicate! wave at it.
-
-
No, full of laggers and cheaters
-
-
-
-
After seeing how many people are paying for lighthouse runs and/or get carried.. I'd have to say no...
-
-
No, because then the emblem would be too exclusive and it would force the entire community to play a game mode that's dead broken right now.
