Who cares? Xbox had the Call of Duty franchise by the balls for years and now it's all of the sudden terrible that PlayStation does? Get over yourself. It's called business. You are just a number, no matter what platform you play on. Remember that. Buy games with that in mind. You'll eventually come to realize that timed exclusives and fully exclusive titles are just business decisions. That's the way it is. It's not going to change. It creates competition.
English
-
I never really cared Blops 3 is Titanfall COD edition
-
Titanfall is made by people who left Infinity Ward (a Call of Duty developer). Of course the games are going to be similar. If anything Titanfall is just Modern Warfare 3 with wall running and jetpacks. Not to mention absolutely abysmal AI enemies in the multiplayer. Black Ops 3 is likely Titanfall done right. Personally, I'm not a Call of Duty fan. I liked a few titles from the series, but it's a stale formula using a decade-old engine. Titanfall and Call of Duty are the same shit, really. Titanfall's lack of popularity shows that it wasn't a very good competitor for Call of Duty anyway.
-
Since Tianfall had the parkor before cod that was my real reasoning behind that. Also you could say Halo is a cod knock off but we both know which is superior.
-
Editado por Is__Endless: 8/20/2015 6:03:48 AM[quote]Since Tianfall had the parkor before cod that was my real reasoning behind that.[/quote] You can't say stuff like that, though. Everything is pioneered. Like, that's similar to comparing Grand Theft Auto and Watch Dogs. They're very similar, but they're also very different. Titanfall and Black Ops 3 are the same scenario. Very similar, but also very different. [quote]Also you could say Halo is a cod knock off but we both know which is superior.[/quote] You kinda lost me here. I'm not sure anybody could say that Halo is a Call of Duty knock off. The only real similarity is that you shoot shit with guns until the thing you're shooting at is dead. However, I will state that neither is superior. There's a difference between what we like most and what is objectively [i]better[/i]. A comparison I like to make involves food. Food A is objectively better for you than Food B, but you may prefer (subjective) Food B. With video games, there's only the subjective. This means that Game A isn't necessarily [i]better[/i] than Game B, you just like it more. When it comes to AAA titles (Halo, Destiny, Call of Duty), you know the quality is more than likely good, or at least better than the majority of non-AAA titles. These games have high budgets and stellar marketing campaigns. So, really, these titles aren't better than each other in any objective sense. You can, however, prefer one game over another. That's perfectly reasonable. I will state that I did play quite a bit of Halo in my Xbox days. I enjoyed quite a bit of it. I've also had fun on Call of Duty. I'm not sure which I prefer right now, because I wasn't big on Halo 4. I hated it, but I also hated Advanced Warfare. TL;DR You liking a game, doesn't mean it is objectively better. You just like it more. AAA titles are typically of the highest quality, so there's really no way to determine which game is [i]better[/i]. Even non-AAA titles can be up to par with AAA titles in some people's minds. It's just the nature of preference. No single release is going to interest everybody. This may create elitism among players and playerbases, but that's just life. People confuse preference with fact, and it's silly.
-
Calm the eff down dude. You gotta chill with that shiz
-
I'm not excited, guy. Am I not allowed to have an intelligent conversation with another intelligent member of the forum? Trolls are getting really lazy these days.
-
You're a troll.
-
Muted. *sigh*