Stop wasting time on marathon. Marathon will never be popular because it's not a serious game. Who's idea was it? Dmg chat with his trials sherpas and came up with the idea?
Marathon ain't bad, like trials isn't, but you can't sell a trials of osiris game and expect casuals to invest fully. It's a game for several thousands, nothing that keeps servers on. Bring d3 to the carpet.
I tried marathon, good marketing, awful experience. Drop the fetishizing about incorporating carry culture in your games please. Every game doesn't need a " i got something, u dont mentality ". According to metrics, you'd made triple the money marathon made if you sold a patrol only game.
I suggest never putting weapons behind skill , let stuff be rng, 3% chance anything can drop upon exfil. You'd be surprised how many players would grind. The wallah and frostbolts can have exclusive cosmetics and emblems and extra xp for their competitive flex , those guys could wipe stacked lobbies with a sponsor kit. They the best players on earth. I don't think they need the best weapons to succeed. My point is, the casuals need to know there's a chance to obtain the best weapons, playing their way.
We know cryo is instant death, that's wayyyy above our skill set. By allowing the weapons to drop with rng, more sweats would play different, maybe they won't gatekeep cryo right, because that exclusive gun might drop from dire marsh. That's my feedback, whatever you decide, don't remove the exfil requirements. Thanks
English
#destiny2
-
6 RepliesAgain for the 50th time. Destiny 3 by the Same company that managed to ruin both Destiny 1 and 2? Absolutely not Destiny 3 from a different company that would probably care more? Absolutely.
-
6 RepliesDon't be so naive. Bungie can't make a good expension for D2 and you are asking for D3? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
-
Edited by Obelix: 5/1/2026 1:52:49 PMIt’s sad to see such a serie of bad decisions from Bungie. The EoF new model fell flat and the game lost players, and their new IP is so niche it’s barely pulling more player than D2, a months and half after launch. I don’t want to be bleak, but the professional in me has a hard time seeing a D3 coming in the current financial situation.
-
2 RepliesWhen bungo decided to do Maraflop 5 years ago instead of D3, who knows Sony might have started developing D3 in the background, if they did, they've had 5 years work on it. It's just a guess obviously.
-
3 RepliesAs long as Sony dismantles Bungie and hands the Destiny IP over to a competent and less slimy dev studio, then I'm all for a D3.
-
4 RepliesD3 will have the same issue d2 has.
-
6 RepliesWhy does everyone think changing the number is like a magic eraser? Bungie is still bungie magically changing a 2 to 3 isnt going to fix bungie. Want more of the same with regrinding all of our stuff to continue the fate saga? I def dont. 3 wont be different than 2 we will just have to regrind our stuff, stop asking for nonsense.
-
I fully agree. But D3, the devs that are still passionate about Destiny, & the Tiger engine should go to a studio under PlayStation’s umbrella that actually wants to & is excited to produce Destiny. I don’t think the current staff at Bungie cares about or wants to produce Destiny anymore. If Bungie is deemed worthy of continuing Destiny - so be it. But if it’s going to be just more Year of Prophecy - give the IP to another studio.
-
7 RepliesThe current staff is not capable of making a D3.
-
4 RepliesBetween Destiny 2 and marathon bungie are in a pretty deep hole. Sony won't fund a D3 they ate more likely to call bungie a write off and move on especially considering 3.6 billion for live service expertise that hasn't payed off.