JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Varios

Navega una corriente de discusiones aleatorias.
3/17/2014 3:23:23 PM
7

Thoughts on the UN

What's everyone's thoughts on the UN and what they do?

Publicando en idioma:

 

Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • I believe it was created with the purpose of ending the Korean War, that war is still going on...

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • I don't have the time to write a lenghty overview right now, but I am all in favor of the UN. It's a forum for international diplomacy and relations to allow states and organizations to coexist, deal with issues and seek to improve themselves. It plays a vital role in peacekeeping, providing humanitarian aid when needed and observing the state of human rights. And, perhaps most importantly, they are the most prominent organisation in the field of international treaties which obviously are of great importance. That being said, they are not without flaws. The vetos in the UNSC, issues with funding, corruption and the incompentence of some organs are all major issues that could be dealt with a lot better.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • Editado por Mags: 3/18/2014 2:48:23 AM
    They are an effective entity to allow state-actors a space in which to openly discuss matters relevant to them or between them and another state or states. They are also good at monitoring crises, allocating funds and aid to areas in need, as well as providing financial aid to those states who need it. What people seem to get tripped up on is their security enforcement. The UN, alone, is not and was never meant to enforce their resolutions via force. This comes from the state actors within the UN who so choose to enforce these laws and norms. This is why the UNSC passes resolutions authorizing the use of force; those states who do choose to use force to punish a state are doing so legally and not breaking any international law by doing so. The ineffectiveness emanating from the UN (or rather, the UNSC) is the veto power that the five permanent members have. As seen with Syria or Crimea, these states can veto resolutions that they feel undermine their interests. However, that being said, they are not a pointless organization. In an anarchic (no central government not chaos) system like how the world operates, the world needs an international institution to provide some sort of obligations, rules, and norms that states should abide by.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • I don't care

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • A global entity with no real power that likes to guilt-trip the U.S. (and sometimes the EU) into supporting its efforts.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • The UN is completely pointless

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

  • One of the most corrupt organizations on this planet. If not the most.

    Publicando en idioma:

     

    Pórtate bien. Echa un vistazo a nuestro Código de conducta antes de publicar tu mensaje. Cancelar Editar Crear escuadra Publicar

    14 Respuestas
    No se te permite acceder a este contenido.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon