Don't like Dark Souls. I enjoyed Bloodborne but I just couldn't get into souls. Dark souls and Bloodborne are also completely wrong from a non personal view, people bitch about difficulty all the time.

"It's too hard!" Is not hate. That's complaining about their own lack of skill. "Too challenging" is not a valid argument. Sorry if it's not Skyrim, or some other ass game that can be beaten with minimal effort/take no skill. If a game isn't challenging, there's nothing to keep me playing. So no, I don't like easy games. I enjoy challenging games. And if you think any of the souls games are just too hard, just get better. There's a reason that saying exists.

[quote]"It's too hard!" Is not hate. That's complaining about their own lack of skill. "Too challenging" is not a valid argument. Sorry if it's not Skyrim, or some other ass game that can be beaten with minimal effort/take no skill. If a game isn't challenging, there's nothing to keep me playing. So no, I don't like easy games. I enjoy challenging games. And if you think any of the souls games are just too hard, just get better. There's a reason that saying exists.[/quote] believe it or not some people enjoy slipping into a world they can easily immerse themselves in without super challenging tasks every 10 minutes. your opinion is wrong just like everyone else's, quit acting like you're a saint for your preferred challenge. mr. white knight fedora.

Woohoo, another one misses the point. Saying a game intended to be hard is "too hard" is calling it a success. Not a fault. Also I love how you tried to somehow demoralize me by calling myself a white knight fedora...yet, not only was that term completely out of place, it doesn't even make sense. Nowhere in here am I defending somebody else. Lmfao get better insults, dude. You oppressive shitlord.

white knighting your "challenging" games mister :(

I honestly can't stand the souls series.

Get better.

You and the rest of the community are awful too. "Git gud casual". It's just an incredibly slow and boring game to me. The difficulty I don't care about. But every one of you will defend dark souls to the grave, and according to you guys the only people that don't like it is because they " suck" at the game. Not true in the slightest. Millions of people have beaten those games, you're not part of some supreme gamer group.

most soul's players have a white knight complex and think that because they're good at a game and that some aren't that makes them a part of the elite gaming gods. want a challenge? beat battle toads with no deaths. actually just beat battle toads lmao.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=White+Knight+Syndrome As you can see by this definition, I fall under all of these categories.

bc urban dictionary is citable lmfao

Because "white knight complex" is a real term that is in citable sources and-oh wait. It's a term made up by the Internet. You'll only find it on urban dictionary. What you're essentially saying is "No that's wrong I have my own definition to support my own crumbling narrative." You're pretty much saying I'm a white knight by being sarcastic. Yeah. Huh. And that I'm defending a game? Is that an insult? If by defending a game you mean disproving all of your poorly thought out claims against it, then sure. I'm not listing why the game is great. I'm not saying why i love the game. I'm not trying to prove you anything. I'm simply telling you you're wrong. If I made false claims, and somebody proved me wrong, I'd move on. You continue to return here for literally no reason. So far your argument is that 1. I'm a white knight[proven otherwise] 2. The game sucks because it's too hard[proven otherwise] I already gave you the most credible source for the term(however if you show me a source that says "white knight" means to be a sarcastic asshole to those who disagree with you, then I'll accept it). The game doesn't suck because it's too hard. [i]You don't like it because it's too hard.[/i] There's a huge difference. You moron. The developers intended for the game to be hard. The game is known for being hard. That is the -blam!-ing point. So no, saying that it's bad due to its difficulty is false in and of itself. Objectivity and subjectivity, bud. If it's difficulty is why it's bad, why is it critically acclaimed for being a great game--even with its difficulty? Also, you brought up other hard games. And I'm assuming you didn't read. The Dark Souls franchise isn't hard to anybody who's good at it. Just as it is for [i]literally everything ever.[/i] Hence why the term "Git gud" is so common. Or...are you telling me you take that seriously? Really? Are you a retard? So saying that we have some sort of complex whilst saying that we don't even know what hard games are...kinda hypocritical, huh? Anyways, I'm done here. You'll still find a way to prove your stupidity in some way.

compensation for how unstable your own train of thoughts are. chill out, -blam!-.

Yeah no kidding lol.

1) Sarcasm 2) Slow? Lmfao. The entire game is killing shit. Sorry if it's not your usual fetch quest game like Skyrim or Assassins Creed or what have you. I guess "always in combat" means "slow" nowadays. You do realize the reason the souls community says that is because 1) if you're good at the game, there's almost no challenge. And people's number one complaint is "it's too hard!!"(meanwhile that's not a valid reason to why it's bad). 2) to make people like you angry lmfao

classic sarcasm mask

A game should never be criticised over its difficulty. Bloodborne had 99 positive reviews, 1 negative. The only one negative review was from a guy who complained about how the game was "too hard." This amateur should've never done the Bloodborne review, let a more capable person do the review. I understand that the souls games are niche, not for everyone. Why write a review unless you've cleared the game, or hate on something you know nothing about?...