{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/8/2015 10:51:10 PM
1
Apparently you missed the point of funding research
And the whole age thing was a swing and a miss
English
-
The whole point of research. Research is funded quite well without donations from the geneal public. As for the age comment. It most certainly wasn't a miss. Maturity is directly related to one's age. The running theory is that as people age, they become wiser and more mature. Your initial post was immature and therefore represents your age. Anybody who takes to name-calling to make a point on something they know little to nothing about, is quite immature.
-
Okay mister smart mature guy, why don't you tell me why people who are dedicated to finding a cure for cancer wouldn't call you a twat for thinking they wouldn't want to loose their jobs because a cure was found?
-
Is that a serious question? Do you even have a clue how much money is being pumped into research? Do you have any idea how well pharmaceutical companies live selling the medicine to keep the cogs greased? You say they are dedicated to finding the cure. A percentage of people are in fact dedicated to that cause with the purist intentions. However, more people are dedicated to making sure they have fat pockets. Be honest with yourself, and look at human nature for what it is. More money changes hands treating cancer than it ever will curing it. If you actually do some research on what is involved from diagnosis to death, the numbers will blow your mind. I know about it because I had the privilege of watching both my parents take their last breaths due to cancer. As long as humans exist, so will greed. There is no money to be had in a cure when all the money is being made in the treatment.
-
Okay one big question for you Do you realise that a pharmacy that sells an actual cure will make more money that one that sells painkillers instead?
-
Editado por Abyss_Is_Bliss: 10/9/2015 3:33:40 AMNo they most certainly will not. You are talking about one cure that isolates and destroys the cancer gene. One pill across the board, or a bottle of said pills, or a series of shots. As it stands currently, hundreds of different types of pills are being pumped out with side effects that require a variation of medicine, not to mention hospital visits. Will the cure be cheap? No. To a cancer patient, it's cheaper than the incoming bills that stack up just from calling the doctor.
-
Yeah because if there is a cure for cancer it's a single pill genius
-
Reading comprehension really isn't your area of expertise is it? I am done talking at you. It's a frustrating experience trying to have a conversation with someone at your level of intelligence. Goodnight.
-
Look you -blam!-ing twat I don't give a shit about weather or not you want to "talk at" me but you really got a -blam!-ing screw loose if you think that just because someone reads what you say that they'll -blam!-ing believe your twisted reality Oh by the way you stupid -blam!-ing twat the money they are given for treatment, guess what that does? [i]oh duhh i don't know, goes into their wallets[/i] no you stupid -blam!-ing twat, it gets spent on treatment If you want to tell me that pharmacys wont sell cures because they make more money off -blam!-ing people up and making them pay for drugs to counter the side affects you really mustn't have a very high level of intelligence yourself because if they make a cure, it will still -blam!-ing have side affects Annnd the people working on a cure don't see a -blam!-ing cent of the money that goes into the treatment of it, and they won't even -blam!-ing loose their jobs, the pharmacys won't go bankrupt -.- [spoiler]oh and if you think people can't donate money to help cancer research you are a real idiot[/spoiler] But sure continue to tell me I can't comprehend what you are telling me or should I say "talking at" me
-
A greedy person would sell it for a lot, not bury it and pretend cancer has no known cure
-
If they wanted to make money, they would make more money actually working, go have a look at how much they earn dipshit surely it's not enough to continue to let cancer go without a cure How's this for a question, do you really think the "government" puts all the money in their -blam!-ing savings accounts?
-
I've got another question, when the money goes into the treatment, you do realise that's being spent on treatment right?
-
Or is that not wise enough for you?
