{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/18/2024 7:02:11 AM
7
A weird subject for Jedi
So, something strange I noticed in Star Wars regarding Jedi. Jedi are not allowed to have attachments as it can be seen as a weakness or exploit that can be used to lure them to the darkside.
Technically speaking, Jedi can still have a romantic partner or have one-night stays though, so long as it doesn't interfere with their ability to function as keepers of the peace.
In theory, if a Jedi were able to retain competent and professional at work than basically they could have children and as long as they don't get too attached said child could be raised in the same temple they were raised at to be a Jedi.
Jedi are allowed to get freaky, no strings attached, food for thought...
English
#Offtopic
-
Every Jedi would have some form of attachment that would be permanent. Their Parents. Unless of course they are some form of species that his hatched from a clutch of eggs with no idea of their lineage. But for all the hominid species, this would have been a real probable attachment. It was all played out with Anakin, and later with Luke. [quote]Jedi are allowed to get freaky, no strings attached, food for thought...[/quote] Maybe it's just a form of control, to limit the possibility of too many progenitor Jedi or Sith from creating their own brood of Force wielding army. Maybe a vow of becoming a eunuch or monk should have been required for a "no attachment" life style to work.
