not announced by Ubisoft but the creative director behind the IP pretty much says so.
also says the game wasn't perfect and that they're making changes to the sequel.
what do you think? good, bad or meh? what would you want changed in the sequel?
-
First one was hyped to hell, played it and it was trash. Poor protagonist, boring story and very little to hold your interest for extended periods of time. I don't have much hope for any of Ubisoft's massive releases, but who knows. Surprisingly their best games over the last year or so are smaller lesser known titles: Child of Light and Valiant Hearts: The Great War. Perhaps they should let whatever team of developers that developed those have a crack at a major title.
-
Edited by Evil Llama 171: 1/19/2015 3:02:19 PM[url=http://example.com]http://www.reactiongifs.com/nooooooooooooo/link[/url] God help us...
-
Played it for a week then gave it away
-
They shouldn't have developed Watch Dogs for last gen, hopefully they won't make the same mistake again.
-
So who here has actually played the game? I see a lot of defamation and very few playing? Do you think that's right? Not playing the game and talking trash about the sequel.. Well we are on B.net.. Lol
-
Edited by Jono: 1/19/2015 8:40:21 AMIts needs to be better than GTA if its gonna be successful and it needs to be x1000000 better than the first Watch Dogs. I remember people saying that the first one was gonna be a "GTA Killer" but the game ended up killing itself. Watch Dogs 2 can't make the same mistake again.
-
If they can add to the base of what they have then good, at least this time they don't need to tone the game down for the previous generation of consoles and might actually be able to produce what they said they would with the first
-
Lollololol Omg these forums are great. Who's played watch dogs again? hahahaha. Talking trash and you haven't even played the first. These forums are bungies playground. I don't doubt it at this point
-
Yes, please change the title and get the name right. Destiny servers have been down frequently so the help section is up to date. Refer to that if you are to clueless on how to change the title..
-
It's Watch_Dogs, get the name right
-
Who doesn't love Canadian devs? I mean.. Come one.. Who here has actually played the first one to comment on the second. I'm going to look at the gaming history of every negative reply just to see if this is really bungies toy forum I'll post the results in 2 and 2
-
Watchdoges pls
-
Cool another game I won't buy
-
It can be good. Now that they have gotten feedback they can try to correct the mistakes/things people didn't like with the first one. It has potential but it's up to Ubi to right the ship with it or there won't be a third one.
-
[quote]what would you want changed in the sequel?[/quote] Ubisoft's outright and unabashed hatred for the PC as a platform, for starters.
-
Hopefully they don't downgrade......again
-
They just need to stop
-
I don't care.
-
-
Watchdawgs :D
-
Lol ubisoft
-
I think the game would awesome if protagonist had a personality and perhaps if you started playing before his neice died giving you a chance to the characters bond more....would of made her death and his revenge more appealing and I would of cared more
-
xRADIOACT1V3x
A Burning Memory -- - old
Im not TOO excited, but I wouldn't mind seeing the changes. I kind of liked watchdogs. -
Knew that was coming before watchdogs was released. Ubisoft said something along the lines of "Only interested in making games that can become franchises" Long as they take their time with it and it doesn't take away resources from them making The Division, then WD2 is fine with me
-
[i]NOOOOO[/i]
-
Maybe the 2nd will be like what they promised with the 1st one? :3