-
Thought the same thing
-
Edited by mustafarkilla: 12/19/2014 10:15:57 PM[quote]He gives it a 6 but the review reads much lower than that.[/quote] Probably because Activision paid them for a score of 6 or higher to show it doesn't completely suck, just somewhat suck. We all know better. Lackluster is too generous of a description for the so called "expansion". Can't wait to see how lacking House of Wolves is going to be.
-
honestly it should be 4 for the simple fact at how bungie handled old legendaries and exotics and the new radiant materials and exotic shards. 3 if you factor in the price tag for the laughable amount of content.
-
My thoughts exactly I was reading thinking like a three... Nope 6 wtf ign. 9 for cod (if I remember correctly) last time I listen to them for game reviews.
-
I thought they were paid to give CoD a good score, but Activision would have done the same thing for Destiny.. I'm confused :p
-
Exactly
-
Oh I get it. Activision paid them to give a better-than-normal review. Just shows how bad this expansion really is when a paid score is 6/10.