{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by index:
11/14/2014 2:24:54 AM
47
343 vs. Bungie - Who screwed up worse?
IMO, even in the wake of MCC's obvious couldn't-give-a-f*ck cash grab launch, Bungie [i]still[/i] screwed up worse, for the simple reason that Destiny is fundamentally a bad game, while MCC at least has the potential to get back on track with patches.
-
That's a tough choice. Because both screwed up in different departments. [b]343[/b] Remastered games. Can't even make multiplayer work when these games have already been released! Split screen is terrible for online. The achievement issue drives me nuts. The game randomly crashes and in co-op you have to restart the mission. [b]Bungie[/b] New game. Destiny [u]was[/u] interesting...was. The final product was not what I was expecting. The story is nonexistent. The constant grind for no reward. Personally not my style. So for me, it was a big let down. So who is worse? Remastered games that barely work, crash and no online. Or, a new game that didn't live up to expectations? Hm...
