{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by index:
11/14/2014 2:24:54 AM
47
343 vs. Bungie - Who screwed up worse?
IMO, even in the wake of MCC's obvious couldn't-give-a-f*ck cash grab launch, Bungie [i]still[/i] screwed up worse, for the simple reason that Destiny is fundamentally a bad game, while MCC at least has the potential to get back on track with patches.
-
5 RepliesEdited by CharlieAlphaSeve: 11/20/2014 11:46:46 AM343 successfully port the halo campaigns without many bugs. The multiplayer is very buggy but can be fixed with a TU. Halo 4 was mildly fun, just had a terrible multiplayer Bungie created a game with great core mechanics. But sadly you have to wait, then pay for everything else, either that or you can continuously do the same thing over and over again. Bungie screwed up bad with Destiny, that can't be fixed soon. [u]Edit:[/u] and I won't determine anything about Halo 5 till I play it.
