It is never fact when it comes to entertainment being a good or bad experience. There is only biased perspectives on the person's experience with said material. Saying it was a success is literally a general consensus that they enjoyed said experience.(which both sides, good and bad, have tendencies to get mob mentalities). That aside, I am perplexed how ridiculous the criticism of the game has gotten over hear say of ONE individual, on the internet no less (not always the best source of factual information). Sure there are the supposed game content on the disc with the placeholder names (which IS quite incriminating), but seeing as how you cannot play it, let alone learn anything meaningful from it...how does that exactly translate into "cut content"? Sure the evidence is there.... but there really isn't anything else other than speculation at this point. ...for both sides of the argument. Now excuse me while I go enjoy the game.