{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/10/2014 6:40:28 AM
2
Be mad, but it's true. Half the posts are about being rewarded for losing. That make sense to you?
English
-
Efficiency is the slogan of modern days skrub. If you earned something off losing you would still be working towards said stated goal, maintaining some level of efficiency. Especially for an event that is only 7 days and demands that you win upwards of hundreds of games to actually get anything out of it. Getting nothing out of loss means 0 efficiency, and for a limited time event having 0 efficiency for a large portion of your effort means wasted effort. Putting your effort towards a win however... maybe you can use brain cells and not a 20 year old philosophy textbook you bought at a bookstore to fill that in.
-
Being efficient is great and all, but it's a game that's touted as not being for the faint of heart. Giving rewards for losing cheapens victories. If you lose a game you have wasted an opportunity. That's the point. If you lose you get CM, XP and non-IB rep. You also get a shot at random loot. Quit acting entitled. I write computer scripts for a living so I understand efficiency. But there are situations where losing is just losing. You should get nothing.
-
Yes it does. Bc if you want full games with max teams, in this game, under all the current conditions you have to have it. Staying on a losing team is inefficient right now.
