{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/2/2014 1:47:30 PM
14
Let's rationally debate super
So let's talk supers, I've been hearing a lot of talk that Hunters Supers are OP. The blade dancers damage mitigation could probably be lowered, but the gunslinger is fine. The Titans falcon punch damage mitigation and area of effect should be changed, I don't think I should get hit when I've doubled jumped above him and the bubble shield still protects him even after he's left it. Warlocks nova bomb again pretty much invincible on start up and a massive blast radius, and the sunsinger well I think it's fine I at least have a chance to run. I just believe that people think the hunter class is op because 60% of the community picked hunters therefore you probably die by them a lot therefore making idiots think thier op. People do me a favour and use a hunter and see how good you do it's all perspective.
-
2 RepliesMeh, I feel like the classes are all pretty balanced. I do feel like hunter supers are pretty freaking boss, but then I look at the warlock grenades with envy. Hunters imo have the least powerful grenades by a significant margin. Titans have more armor typically depending on how they're spec'd so if I'm fighting one and we're both head shoting consistently he comes out on top thanks to survivability. I blame all the hate on Hunter supers on those damn sexy cloaks. If it weren't for the super sexy cloaks not nearly so many people would have picked them over the other classes and thus you wouldn't get killed by 3 arc blade guys in a row so much. Tldr: Don't just look at supers, look at classes as a whole.
