{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Account 1:
10/2/2014 3:32:30 PM
3
Agree. Though if recent threads are to be believed...it DID HAVE an epic story. It just met the axe < 12 months ago. I think the question is WHY!?
At this point, there are so many scatterbrained subplots I really don't know how DLC can sort through the mess.
[b]EDIT 1: [/b] And to those who argue that "Destiny is a 10 yr plan, give it time, etc." I think its pretty common knowledge that if you're planning a story with any type of longevity, each "episode" needs to have its own story arc / resolution regardless of the main plot.
Examples:
Star Wars IV: Death star destroyed.
Harry Potter 1: Sorcerer's stone saved.
Etc, etc.
With Destiny? We have no idea what the point was...
English
-
Regardless of how well it was implemented, my answer to your last question would have to be: Star Wars: Death Star Destroyed Harry Potter: Sorcerers stone saved Destiny: Heart of the Black Garden destroyed It's not that destiny doesn't have a story arc or the elements of a narrative, it's just that it's weak on characterization and on how it delivers the plot (ie dinkelbot)
-
We didn't destroy anything about the so called "Heart" Killed three copypasta gate lords and it just disappeared. Very anti-climacticly at that. Then the Stranger gave us a lame rare pulse rifle that fully upgraded was weaker then what we already had equipped while the speaker delivered a pretty politician speech in the background.
-
I never said it was a good ending, but you were arguing that it had no ending at all (or at least not a climactic one). All I'm saying is that there was a story arc, even if it was badly executed.
