{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/29/2011 2:00:50 AM
70
CE isnt a classic because its good
Its a classic because at the time, it was the first of its kind, and no one had seen anything like it. It revolutionarised gaming. People were amazed.
But now, ten years later, you lok a it and realise ifs a pretty crap game
The only reason people still say they love it is because they loved it at the time and refuse to let go, and refuse to let newer games in. Thats why theres so much hate for Reach IMO.
And i think Bungie knew this. They knew no one had seen anything like it, and they would be so blown away by it that they woulldnt realise how crappy a game it was. They didnt have to make it good. They could have easily made it to the quality of Halo 2 or Halo 3. These two games are great because bungie realised people would expect more.
I know i said i'd leave you guys alone, but i had to get this off my chest. Now to prepare for the armies of evil nostalogic people (sorry been playing too much Oblivion)
And any typos in thispost are down to this crappy iPad, not me
-
MR RATCHETYoutube - MR RATCHET - old
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dirtmcgirt2004 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] xMCxVSxARBITERx I honestly don´t think the campaign was that good in the original CE, more lame than good. But I am not saying that it´s bad. I think it´s very good but when compared to the other Halo games (H2 and H3) I think it is worse. I think it is far away from as good as Halo 2s campaign. But now with anniversary (and terminals) I think it might be as good as Halo 3s campaign. And for me H3s campaign is not that far away from H2s. And I agree. I think it´s the classic because it´s simply the first Halo.[/quote] This whole thread is crazy, especially your response. So CE's campaign is lame, but Anniversary's is so much better? And what exactly is the big difference here? They polished it up, that's it, right? Same levels, same weapons, same story. It's like all you care about is the superficial (how awesome the graphics are, how good the rag doll effects are, does this game have achievements?, etc.). Someone correct me if I'm wrong because I haven't played Anniversary, but what is the difference between it and CE's campaign that makes CE lame but not Anniversary. I don't know about you guys, but to me story and gameplay are the two most important factors in a video game, and nothing comes close to those two. I'm thinking that those who trash Halo CE and praise all the others after it, never played CE until after they played the others and can't seem to understand that games have technologically improved from 2001 to 2011.[/quote] There is no difference. The responses of some members of this forum astounds me. As you said and i can confirm, it's just Halo CE with updated graphics. The terminals weren't really all that interesting apart from 1 or 2 and the Keyes terminal. Skulls were a nice touch but they've been done before. To say it's as good as Halo 3's campaign because of these factors is just plain idiotic. In fact, I'd even go as far to say as Halo 3 had the weakest story of them all, it felt rushed and they borrowed alot of idea's from CE. [Edited on 12.30.2011 4:16 AM PST]
