{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by SpaceDandy:
8/27/2014 11:48:45 PM
1
If you really look at it, though, like really really look, you'll find that the liberal party is actually more elitist than the republicans, and their policies actually further increase the gap between rich and poor.
Sure, republicans have super PACs, but the Democratic Party is so puppeteer'd by lobbyists it's almost unbelievable. They cater to large corporations that buy them off in the elections, and then spend favors on taxpayer's dollars. Just look at Solyndra, GM, and AIG. Why the hell did we invest in any of that bullshit? Did you know that Obama, as a senator (2 years) voted for the AIG bailout? $165 million of which was spent in bonuses.
I'm not saying republicans are better than democrats, but perhaps it's their turn to try to begin repairing the country. Obama promised change, it came, and it's needed once again.
English
-
I totally agree. Thats whats so sickening about liberals. They preach how theyre warriors for the poor and middle class, when all of their policies serve to trap people on government assistance and low income. And about your point on a republican getting a chance to repair the country, people will argue that they lost their chance with Bush. But come on man, the guy had one of the biggest economic disasters in recent history (9/11) on his hands, and then had to declare war. People give him so much crap for getting us into the war in Iraq, but we all know thats what we expected him to do after we were attacked on our own soil.
