JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

7/31/2014 7:02:47 AM
2
Fine as long as these huge Zerg Clans do not get any bonus over small clans just for having huge numbers, rewards for clan activity should scale with numbers. Small tight clans that are high achievers should be able to rank with Zerg clans who have 80% of their members inactive. Clan rankings should be based on total achievement points across the entire clan divided by their number of members. This way large clans can exist as the OP wanted but small clans can also be recognised for their achievement on an equal footing, pure membership numbers should not be a reward in itself
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Not disagreeing: Clans should have minimal/no benefits over individuals. That I can agree to. I just want everyone in Void to proudly have the name void when they play. Not "Void 2" or "Void Bravo". I want us all under 1 name.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Having been in very prestigious guilds in EQ1 I can understand your sentiment. I see no problem with massive guilds. My concern is that if there is some sort of ranking system it's based on proportional achievement and nit size alone. Anyway congratulations for achieving your aims and good luck to you and your Guild

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon