Sprint in Halo 5, aye or nay?
This is amazing, 60 aye, 60 nay.
-
I only voted Aye to try to keep it 50-50. It doesn't make much difference to me either way.
-
AT&T > Sprint
-
-
yes go back and play halo with out sprint it sucks
-
Nay. I don't think they'll get rid of it though.
-
[i] [/i]
-
No. The best halo games didn't have it in their multi player. It's not needed and is detrimental to gameplay
-
Bump.
-
-
At this point it doesn't seem like they'd get rid of it. However, with 3/4 games of the MCC not having sprint, who's to really say?
-
Edited by stip1134: 6/12/2014 1:46:53 PMWow we are currently 50-50
-
I wouldn't really be devastated or anything if it was still included, but I would prefer if it wasn't.
-
I choose [b]Gay[/b]
-
Not a big fan of it..
-
Edited by Jotaro Kujo PhD: 6/12/2014 3:58:21 AM>Aye is winning I'd more than welcome something like thruster pack, but sprint should just pack its bags and GTFO of Halo. The game is too damn slow with sprint.
-
Indifferent.
-
No. Halo had great pace in the multiplayer until Reach. That's when things turned sour.
-
no, spartans are always doing 30mph, so they should always be fast, but have normal person teir gravity.
-
I don't care if it's in the Campaign but definitely keep it out of the multiplayer.
-
Of course.
-
-blam!- nay
-
Yes. I'm not a huge fan when it comes to Armor Abilities, but I actually really like sprint. Plus I mean you'd think a super soldier should be able to sprint. Just my opinion.
-
I don't care about the abilities but they NEED to get rid of the perks.
-
Maybe for Big Team.
-
No because Halo 5 should have good gameplay.
-
I'm happy with Sprint (and Evade). It's all the other armor abilities that piss me off.