{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/29/2014 5:43:12 AM
7
>comes into thread
>every pro-gun user in the off-topic bashing and using ad hominem on pro-gun control users itt just because they don't share the same opinion
This isn't helping your image of wanting to be tolerant of a side that doesn't agree with you, btw.
English
-
WHO NEEDS TO TOLERATE ANYONE WHEN YOU'VE GOT DEADLY FORCE
-
but muh freedums
-
Edited by GHOST270: 5/29/2014 6:48:23 PM[quote]>comes into thread every pro-gun control user in the off-topic bashing and using ad hominem on pro-gun users itt just because they don't share the same opinion > Pro Gun control : MUH EMOTIONS! DEM EVUL GUNSS! WHY WONT ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILLUNNS!?!?!? This isn't helping your image of wanting to be tolerant of a side that doesn't agree with you, btw.[/quote] FTFY.
-
Are you getting a bit emotional because Commissar rekt you?
-
Coming up with flawed and outdated arguments now constitutes that? Top kek
-
I didn't even put any feelers into it. I just tried to argue law and loophole which he completely ignored and tried to change the subject to an almost entirely opposite subject. As in trying to tell me that legitimate arms dealers who rely on the sale of guns for the principal income have to submit to background checks when I'm talking about the 40% of the market that doesn't have to due to claiming hobbyist status (you just have to show that you have a source of income larger than your gun sales) under an incredibly lax private sale clause. All while trying to back himself up with totally bunk websites that sourced to each other and a man who's on the payroll of the gun manufacturing industry and NRA. People wouldn't take a climate scientist that's on the payroll of big oil companies to provide accurate information when it comes to climate change/global warming. Why would they do the same for a man on the payroll of the gun industry and NRA on the issue of gun control? It doesn't make sense to me man.
-
[quote]People wouldn't take a climate scientist that's on the payroll of big oil companies to provide accurate information when it comes to climate change/global warming. Why would they do the same for a man on the payroll of the gun industry and NRA on the issue of gun control?[/quote] My issue with this is that I think people would take a climate scientist seriously who is on the payroll of a green energy company, or green energy advocacy group. Or in this case, a man who has supposedly done the research and found gun laws to be helpful but is on the payroll of an anti gun group, or gun control advocate. Or it just me?
