I watched it for the first time a few months back
It was...alright
I don't know
It wasn't as good as everyone made it out to be
As for your question, Harrison Ford stated that he felt that he character is not a replicate but Ridley Scott stated that he portrayed him as a replicate
It was deep for sure
Things to note:
In the original cut, the rain stops and the dove flies away in clear skies
In the original cut, there's a scene after the final scene in the final cut. They drive to a mountainous area and a voiceover explains that Rachel is a special model with no expiration date
Harrison Ford and Ridley Scott have very conflicting views on the theme and lore of the story
English
-
Am I alone in not catching any of the hints that Deckard was a replicant?
-
I think that his eyes glowed in one of the scenes And the dialogue alluded to him never taking the test himself making us suspicious And there was a lot more in the original cut which alluded to him being a replicate For example, Deckard was told that there are four replicates on the loose out of the six One was killed by the electric gate That should leave one unaccounted for and we are left to suspect that it is Deckard
-
Oh. Yea, I feel really stupid right now.
-
It's k It was a deep movie You won't be able to pick up everything
-
Hmm. That "No-Expiration date" explanation sounds really, really convenient. And stupid. How much more could that conflict with the tone of that movie?
-
I don't know The movie didn't really capture me