{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/9/2014 9:05:00 PM
14
300: Rise of an empire
A ton of blood, whole lot of water, topless dudes, and two hot women pretty much sums up the movie.
If you watched it what did you think of it?
-
If the entire movie is in slo-mo like the first one was, I won't be spending any money to watch it.
-
Compared to the first one, complete bullcrap.
-
1 ReplyI only saw the first one. It was more homoerotic than Top Gun.
-
I chose to watch Non-Stop instead
-
It was good testosterone filled trashy entertainment.
-
I haven't watched it and my mother says that she's not interested in it or any hyper violent movies at the minute for some reason. She hasn't even started watching Game of Thrones or Spartacus yet and they're pretty epic...
-
Edited by Cheat: 3/9/2014 9:48:03 PMI thought it was a completely unnecessary sequel and badly over dramatic. It also seemed like they shoved that sex scene in there just because they could. It was ill-placed and unconvincing. But I suppose it wasn't [i]horrible[/i]; it just wasn't anything near the original movie's level of cool. Overall: D+
-
2 RepliesYeah you pretty much described it perfectly, but it's still good fun if you're just looking for some mindless battle action slow mo
-
I saw it on Friday, good action movie in my opinion.
-
I'll see it... Sometime this month.
-
im gonna guess it wasnt as good as the first one
-
1 ReplyEdited by Gatsby: 3/9/2014 9:20:12 PM300: 2? Why didn't they just call it 600? [spoiler]I'm joking, I'm not stupid[/spoiler]
-
1 Replyi heard it wasn't good i'm not willing to doubt that
-
11 RepliesMeh, it was alright. I'll give it a 7/10.
