{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Deleted User:
12/28/2013 4:54:00 PM
2
What. A Lot of people don't understand is when they state they created jobs, most of them are part time jobs on the service industry with no benefits. So taking them away is bad because when people cant find jobs and have a family to feed they will do whats necessary to keep their family fed. Thus you create criminals that are willing to do anything to feed their family. They get caught then your spending millions in the justice system to not only charge them but to put them in jail. You take the costs of the courts and the penal system to say 50-70 percent of the people who will become criminals because of this. It will cost triple the amount that those benefits cost. Not to mention its pretty shitty considering most have worked and paid taxes to have those benifits.
English
-
An opponent of benefits would say that unemployment checks stop people from finding jobs, thus confining them to a lower class, rather than giving them the motivation to go out and find a job.
-
Edited by Deleted User: 12/28/2013 6:09:32 PMYes but does the good outweigh the bad in this situation what may e good for people might not be good the economy as a whole. Is there not a limit on unemployment?
