{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Darky:
12/4/2013 3:45:48 AM
16
Would this be better as the box art?
I find [url=http://media1.gameinformer.com/filestorage/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/imagefeed/featured/activision2013/destiny/38670/cov_249_front_610.jpg]this[/url] image (Newest cover of game informer) to look much more interesting than [url=http://www.gametrailers.com/side-mission/files/2013/09/DestinyBoxArt640.jpg]this[/url] one, and imo opinion it would look much better as the box art. It looks more interesting and overall it just looks better. Agreed?
-
The original box art was the best IMO, but we may be seeing a trend towards disappointingly generic box covers - take Bioshock infinite for example, Irrational choose a generic image of Booker as the stereotypical GRITTY MILITARY MAN as the box art over other, far more detailed covers to the outrage of the Bioshock community. When Ken Levine was pressed on the issue, he stated that the purpose of the generic cover was to appeal to casual gamers, expecting that original bioshock fans would buy the game regardless of box art. We may be seeing the same thing here. Bungie has to appeal to the crowd that has never heard of Destiny before - and the original box art featuring the traveller - awesome as it is, is hardly going to cut the mustard.
