No other Halo games are present on the list.
-
Bullshit that is just full on bullshit
-
Lol. It's not hard to figure out IGN either got paid to say that so it makes people want to buy the game and go back to it or they are just IGNorant. Like what people are saying about Halo 3. It sold the 360. Halo 4 deserves no spot on a chart for greatness. It's an epic fail for a Halo game. It has less content than the other 2 main games, they removed things for no reason at all and they changed things which resulted in some of them being ruined. Like the zombie only being able to use the sword and the epic fail known as CTF.
-
[i]Far[/i] from it. And why isn't Halo 3, the game that sold so many 360s on there?
-
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH MASS EFFECT #1 Although Bioshock should have been in there instead of -blam!-ing Rock Band.
-
Wtf??????
-
I don't agree so, IGN is biased, got paid, yadda yadda. Whatever makes me feel better.
-
I agree with it being third. But my two and one are BioShock and H3 respectively.
-
So the game that sold so many 360's isn't even on there?
-
Not surprising. You can't spell ignorant without IGN.
-
Edited by Infiltrat0rN7: 11/22/2013 11:36:38 AMmfw the number 1 spot
-
It is a great game, but it's not a Halo game.
-
LOL! IGN.
-
Maybe for slayer, but for me I think it's awful. I'm mainly a grifball player and grifball in Halo 4 is not impressive.
-
Well they're wrong. I'm not sure what Halo game is the best one, but it certainly isn't Halo 4.
-
Even though I love Halo 4, I still call this bullshit.
-
lolign
-
People still take IGN seriously?
-
This is why I no longer take IGN seriously.
-
That's a good one... Oh wait, no it isn't.
-
[quote]No other Halo games are present on the list.[/quote]For all of the reasons in your OP, plus many more; no one really takes IGNorant seriously.
-
what a disgrace. Halo 3 [b]made[/b] the Xbox 360. It should be #1.
-
IGN can go -blam!- themselves.
-
TOP LEL!
-
Unbelievable.
-
Wasn't GTA 5 number 2
-
Boy it sure is cOLD in here! Alright you nitwits... here's the long and the short of this article that is now TWO MONTHS old: - Universally considered a poorly constructed list, just like the comparable list for the PS3. - Both lists were foolishly filled with multi-platform titles. - This list for Xbox 360 was composed by just two staff members. Not a host of editors, just two staff guys. - In my opinion, IGN made this list and the PS3 one and the "Top 100 First Person Shooters" in the lead-up to the new consoles, because they needed more clicks on the website so people would see more ads, and they would be able to afford all the game consoles and new hardware and games they'd have to buy at the end of the year. Still a dick article. Move along people.