Back on what you said Scorptank. The U.S. justifies it like every other weapon we use. It's a weapon and it's legal till the Humanitarian Society or the Genocide Commitie call. Or both for good measure. Look at Hirosheama and Nagasakia, we used A-Bombs to get them to surrender. One thing you have to realize though about weapons like Napalm and the Atmoic Bomb is where would be right now if they weren't used? Sure it's wrong but how many soldiers would have died if we decided to invade mainland Japan at the end of World War II. I agree with you though that they are wrong to use of another human being. But then again if the situation is dire enough I wouldn' t hesitate to use an A-Bomb.
Edit: Sir why don't you add a Hydrogen bomb to your story? They already exist so you just have to get some facts on them. Also they are are as strong, pound for pound as an A-Bomb. Plus no nuclear fallout.
[Edited on 4/25/2005]
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.