{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/2/2009 5:17:14 AM
240
Are the moderators more tolerant of the misbehavior of highly ranked member
So, i have recently come out of hiding. Mainly, due to boredom. I have not posted terribly much. However, a friend of mine mentioned me today that I should be banned because he thinks that all of my posts since my re-emergence border on spam. However, he thinks that the reason I have [i]not[/i] been banned is because of my Mythic status.
Now, as I've not come to the forums for quite a long time(to me), I have no idea if this seems to be a plausible, prevalent phenomenon.
What do you think?
EDIT: argh! accursed character limit in the title bar!
[Edited on 04.01.2009 9:20 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] bobcast [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pezz But as soon as they cross the line, just like anyone else, they're gone. [/quote]I guess my question is, why is the line drawn in different places for different members?[/quote]To my understanding, a user's ban history is a large factor in determining how harsh they will be punished, right? So if the member titles are somewhat of a visual representation of a user's non-recent ban history, then I can see how it would appear that members are being treated differently. Besides bobcast, aren't you against mandatory minimum blacklistings? If it is equality that you are concerned about, then mandatory minimums across the board would be the most equal moderation option.
