{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/8/2013 12:57:02 AM
152
Why isnt Halo 4 as fun as Reach?
Im one of the minority who actually thought, From an MP standpoint mind you, That Halo Reach was a great game, I adored it in fact, Much better than Halo 3's -blam!- MP (Again, I know thats not an opinion shared by most of you, But anyway) Halo 4 just doesnt hold my attention as much, Dont get me wrong its a great game but it just lacks... I dont know, While playing it I just feel like its not something I can do for a long period of time any more, Reach was far more fun and exciting and just generally entertaining.
What the hell is Halo 4 missing?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Hylebos [quote][b]Posted by:[/b]Dreadnough7 I went to a Civilization forum, and the community by a large margin, disliked Civ 5 and prefered 4. Later I found a thread in the Bethesda forums with people arguing how Oblivion was much better than Skyrim, same with Battlefield. This is a wide phenomenon not exclusive to the Halo franchise.[/quote]It's not a phenomenon. That's just common sense.[/quote] Are you implying that those sequels are objectively worse than the earlier games? Anyway, the thing all those threads had in common, is that all of them were variations of the "This game is dumbed down/more streamlined/caters to casuals".
