JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#topic

1/17/2013 7:30:17 PM
5
0
God
God

Are slippery slope arguements ever valid?

We've all heard this arguement: "where will it end?" This question peaked my interest when i was listening to a gun control debate, one side was saying "if we ban assault rifles, will they just go after hunting weapons next" and the other was saying "if we allow assault rifles, are we going to give people rocket launcher's next?" and so on so on. That is a particularly rediculous example, but i have never heard a slippery slope arguement that actually raised reasonable concerns. So does this form of arguement ever actually mean anything or is it just sensationalist nonsense?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by Pyrocatharcis: 1/17/2013 7:33:24 PM
    very very rarely does it have a valid backing in reality. Arguing against the third reich saying that it would be a slippery slope is one such famous example.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon