JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
5/9/2009 3:41:32 PM
179

Halo vs Star Trek

StarWars GearsofWar(s) What about Star Trek? Halo vs Star Trek?
English
#Offtopic #Flood

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] GhostLink2401 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Omnicent [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Agusta1 Halo, Because the technology on star trek is Terrible. Face it everytime the main ship gets shot at the bridge has wires hanging from the ceiling. UNSC would win[/quote] . . . With what? They don't have the gunz to do it.[/quote] Ever heard of a MAC gun? Or the Archer nuclear missiles? Not to mention every ship has a full compliment of Longsword fighters. Granted, Starfleet has shields, but so did the Covenant.[/quote] Right. . . Covies have energy shields, Starfleet has metaphasic shields which are many, many times more powerful. Starfleet has Sovereign, Galaxy and Defiant class ships, all carrying enough firepower to not only glass a planet, but crack it in two. Nuclear missiles would do nothing, hell, even the original Enterprise shrugged off one or two of those, not to mention most of the ships in startrek have been through a black-hole, back in time, forward in time, caught in super-novas and a whole array of crap that would have blown a UNSC frigate sky-high. MAC? It would bounce off the shields like a rubberball and the Longsword's would be swatted like flies by the 10+ banks of phasers. I'd say one torpedo and the fight is over, failing that, we could just call in the Klingons, or the Vulcans or even the Q. . . If he felt like it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon