JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

Edited by Sir Obscure: 7/21/2015 10:26:51 PM
5

Nerfpocalypse Now (part 1: Auto Rifles)

After reading through the coming changes outlined in Weapon Tuning 2.0, I've got to say Bungie, it seems like your hearts in the right place, and you're trying to make Destiny's weapons require more skill to master, yet be more rewarding when mastered. I'm am totally ok with that. In fact, I think that's a great weapon design philosophy/target. However, while I think some of the changes you've outlined will push Destiny further towards this goal, there are also some that strike me as, in a word, absof***inglutely terrible. I'll give you a full rundown of my thoughts/reaction. [b]Auto Rifles[/b] This has been a long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long time coming. Auto rifles are also a case example of the flaws with your balancing philosophy. Given the overall dominance of auto rifles, particularly Suros, you nerfed them to make other weapon class more viable and compelling choices. In this effort, you were largely successful, and guardian primary preferences became more diverse. And then you decided to keep nerfing them. The result? You nerfed them into oblivion and by 1.1.1 auto rifles became the new pulse rifles. And in the end, what did you accomplish? Suros Banner became Thorn and Felwinter's Banner. Let me let you in on a little secret: Crucible is completely and totally unbalanced. Destiny is loaded with incredibly powerful weapons. If all you do is reactively nerf one OP weapon (say, Suros), two more take its place (Thorn, Felwinter). Seeing as how Thorn, Hawkmoon, TLW, Felwinter, and Red Death are all about to be nerfed, my personal prediction is that you are about to bring Crucible full circle. But, hey, I could be wrong. Maybe there's some OP Taken King weapon that everyone will flock to. So, I'll break it down goal by goal, change by change: Goals: * Auto Rifle is optimal at close to medium range -- this makes perfect sense for a fully automatic weapon. Sure, I would think that we'd have figured out some sort of recoil compensation technology by the time we've mastered FTL travel, but whatever, it's a video game. Plus this leaves a place for the persistence perk. * Damage, Stability, and Range are tuned such that players desire Stability for reliable close quarters damage, or Range for better accuracy and increased damage at a distance -- this makes sense, no real problems here. * Elevate Auto Rifles so they are a more competitive option in PVP, and simultaneously more satisfying to use in PVE--a lofty goal, I take it this is your objective for all the underused weapon classes. Changes: * Increase base damage -- I take it this is to make them more competitive with pulse rifles and full auto/high RoF scouts. Makes sense, but with respect to pvp, stability and fall off will need to be carefully managed to keep ARs competitive, but reasonably so. * Small reduction in base stability. Landing shots at optimal range is unaffected, but repeated hits require more weapon control to land consistently -- this is going to be the deciding factor in whether ARs become a competitive option, or the overly dominate other classes. In the beginning, ARs simply shredded everything and you had to be very, very good to outshoot them with another weapon class. It was doable to outshoot a Suros, but it wasn't easy. It sounds like you're trying to keep that from happening again, but you don't have the best track record when it comes to balancing (or updates in general). * Boost damage by 10% against AI combatants -- the sooner you start balancing PvE completely separate from PvP, the better. It seems like you've overwhelmingly focused on pvp when balancing your weapons, often to the detriment to pve (see: fusion rifle nerfs and how no one uses them over shotguns anymore). We'll have to see if 10% is the right buff, but that shouldn't be too hard to tweak. Continued in [url=https://www.bungie.net/en/Forum/Post/140680579]Part 2 with the Exotic ARs[/url]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote] the sooner you start balancing PvE completely separate from PvP, the better.[/quote] I believe that this forms a big problem for Bungie. The idea is that your guardian is the same, wherever you take him. If stuff like jumps/weapons/health work totally different in the crucible than in PvE it'll feel inconsistent and will hurt immersion. At the same time this is quite a challenge to balance...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    2 Replies
    • [quote]Crucible is completely and totally unbalanced. Destiny is loaded with incredibly powerful weapons. If all you do is reactively nerf one OP weapon... two more take its place... the sooner you start balancing PvE completely separate from PvP, the better...[you're] overwhelmingly focused on pvp when balancing... often to the detriment to pve (see: fusion rifle nerfs...[/quote] As someone else said. You nailed it. Also, I miss fusion rifles. D=

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • Nailed it

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • Spot on.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • "This has been a long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long time coming." This, and your later comment in the Necrochasm section, is one of my biggest concerns with the balance patch. I'm not worried that they're going to screw something up monumentally and render one of more weapon classes useless; I expect it. At this point, I think it's a forgone conclusion. My concern is that once they do, they'll follow their current pattern and it will take seven months before they bother to address it. Just an aside, I absolutely agree with your repeated stance that they need to balance PVE and PVP separately.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      1 Reply
      You are not allowed to view this content.
      ;
      preload icon
      preload icon
      preload icon