JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Dingus Khan: 3/11/2015 10:36:04 PM
21

Scientists and Christians are both STUBBORN.

[quote]What is God's relationship to time? Question: "What is God's relationship to time?" Answer: We live in a physical world with its four known space-time dimensions of length, width, height (or depth) and time. However, God dwells in a different dimension—the spirit realm—beyond the perception of our physical senses. It’s not that God isn’t real; it’s a matter of His not being limited by the physical laws and dimensions that govern our world (Isaiah 57:15). Knowing that “God is spirit” (John 4:24), what is His relationship to time? In Psalm 90:4, Moses used a simple yet profound analogy in describing the timelessness of God: “For a thousand years in Your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night.” The eternity of God is contrasted with the temporality of man. Our lives are but short and frail, but God does not weaken or fail with the passage of time. In a sense, the marking of time is irrelevant to God because He transcends it. Peter, in 2 Peter 3:8, cautioned his readers not to let this one critical fact escape their notice—that God’s perspective on time is far different from mankind’s (Psalm 102:12, 24-27). The Lord does not count time as we do. He is above and outside of the sphere of time. God sees all of eternity’s past and eternity’s future. The time that passes on earth is of no consequence from God’s timeless perspective. A second is no different from an eon; a billion years pass like seconds to the eternal God. Though we cannot possibly comprehend this idea of eternity or the timelessness of God, we in our finite minds try to confine an infinite God to our time schedule. Those who foolishly demand that God operate according to their time frame ignore the fact that He is the “High and Lofty One . . . who lives forever” (Isaiah 57:15). This description of God is far removed from man’s condition: “The length of our days is seventy years—or eighty, if we have the strength; yet their span is but trouble and sorrow, for they quickly pass, and we fly away” (Psalm 90:10). Again, because of our finite minds, we can only grasp the concept of God’s timeless existence in part. And in so doing, we describe Him as a God without a beginning or end, eternal, infinite, everlasting, etc. Psalm 90:2 declares, “From everlasting to everlasting You are God” (see also Psalm 93:2). He always was and always will be. So, what is time? To put it simply, time is duration. Our clocks mark change or, more precisely, our timepieces are benchmarks of change that indicate the passage of time. We could say, then, that time is a necessary precondition for change and change is a sufficient condition to establish the passage of time. In other words, whenever there’s change of any kind we know that time has passed. We see this as we go through life, as we age. And we cannot recover the minutes that have passed by. Additionally, the science of physics tells us that time is a property resulting from the existence of matter. As such, time exists when matter exists. But God is not matter; God, in fact, created matter. The bottom line is this: time began when God created the universe. Before that, God was simply existing. Since there was no matter, and because God does not change, time had no existence and therefore no meaning, no relation to Him. And this brings us to the meaning of the word eternity. Eternity is a term used to express the concept of something that has no end and/or no beginning. God has no beginning or end. He is outside the realm of time. Eternity is not something that can be absolutely related to God. God is even beyond eternity.[/quote] Using this as the basis for my argument that both Scientists and Christian leaders are both stubborn gits, why can't they coexist? Science says that the world is billions of years old, and that life developed over time due to natural selection, but that life was an acciden. Christianity says that God created everything, rules everything, and transcends everything. However, Christians draw the line at those two huge scientific theories (and that's what they are, ideas proven multiple times, or at least more so than disproved) and that the world is only a few thousand years old, and God created everything as is. Although I am a devout Christian, I have decided that Christian leaders are the real stubborn ones here. My source quoted above has really given me some food for thought. First of all, God reigns above all of us, and to attempt to understand God is like a plant questioning the farmer as to how he goes about his daily tasks. We simply cannot understand it. [b]Though, because of our nature, we still try.[/b] Secondly, if God created the universe, this means that he must live outside of our known dimension, otherwise he would've created a dimension in which he is within, and a dreadful paradox is created, which may or may not be the truth. So, if God does not perceive time like we do, can't we argue that the bible does [b]not[/b] state that the universe is less than a few billion years old? Also, if the length of time the earth has been around is in fact 4.2 billion years, can't we also argue that natural selection may have happened? Humans were made last, after all of the species had been created and developed. So the question arises, [b]How long were seven days for God in our time?[/b] they may have been hundreds of thousands of years in our perception. So, Adam named all of the animals. It does not say which ones he named; they very well may have been prehistoric species. And while we're at it, why don't we debate the Big Bang Theory? Does the Bible state in what manner the universe was created, or the direction of the particles or masses? [b]TL;DR[/b] The Bible does not directly invalidate many popular scientific theories. So, why can't they coexist? Please, these are my own opinions that I have debated within myself for years, being impacted by both the Christian and Scientific community. Respond civilly or none at all. [b][i]EDIT:[/i] Arguments that do not back themselves up and state facts as to why I am wrong are considered filler content and useless. If you think I'm wrong, prove it. Give me facts, not opinions. Bible verses, for this topic, are considered reasonable arguments.[/b]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What about Christian Scientists?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Semi-Gr8 b8 m8. I r8 4/8. No h8

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Commander Tempu: 3/12/2015 3:23:31 AM
    Every one wishes to be right. The problem goes back to mythology that was used to explain things before science came along. The thing is we need a proper balance of both as simply Science has become fact that many Religions are accepting. Yet so much we do not know about the universe that some faith is a good thing. No one wants to give in as that would admit they are wrong and each side is trying to convert others for a variety of reasons. Faith is more people based and how we live socially function in our environment and have a understanding with a power or god if you will of your choosing. Science is more about the factual side of our environment and the Universe we live in. They tend to not deal with the human element or condition unless its a physical one. Science was discredited by Religion and Now Science seeks to discredit Religion in the same manner. Truth be told that if you take the Strengths from both and none of the Weaknesses then you become smarter more knowledgeable and more dedicated as you as a Scientist need some sort of faith to make things like vaccine to rocket engines. When things are so unclear and experiential as how it would work in a physical environment. Science is about improving our knowledge and greater understanding of the world thus it conflicts with Religion as they seek to give people guidance yet the times have changed some. Some things still apply like being good to ones neighbor. Trying to do the right thing. Religion lets us relate to things on a Deep Artistic Spiritual and Musical level. So like in many human pursuits we have conflicting points of view. It really comes down to the person. How they see things and what they plan on contributing to humanity as a whole. Our beliefs and system of doing things were done before. They were improved till we advanced our understanding thus reaching for the stars. So many great events have happened. Men walking on the Moon. Jesus Buddha and so many other figures defining us as a people and our understanding of self worth and our morals. No one path is set and like in nature each choice gets us farther and deepens our understanding of not only our selves but the world around us. Thus establishing that. Change happens if we do not want it. It happens, Stubborn or Not things will change as people will shape it and people will understand it. Thus change bad or good really depends on the peoples education and understanding. Wars happen when both sides disagree and only force of arms will make one right and the other accepting it is wrong.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    1 Reply
    • Free Kent Hovind

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • Scientists are stubborn because they are right.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • At least scientist are stubborn for the right reason. You know Ike to extend human life, save the earth, expand our knowledge, make life better...

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • "Scientists" aren't stubborn lol, they want proof and the bible just doesn't have any

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      1 Reply
      • Scientists arent stubborn for trying to teach the brain dead morons

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        3 Replies
        • It invalidates the Big Bang theory and evolution, two of the most important and accepted scientific theories out there.

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          4 Replies
          • I've uploaded this video a couple of times. Most won't give it the time of day. The few that do don't have much to say against it. I don't agree 100% on all points but it is interesting none the less. If you watch it let me know, it is a long video but worth it in my opinion.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          • I have no problem with what a person's personal beilef is, and you can be a scientist that believes in god I don't care, but to believe in something without evidence is irrational. And I know someone's gonna say "there's evidence" but their simply isn't its based entirely on faith.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          • FYI, you're mostly referring to the militant fedora wearers when you say scientists. Any scientist who can think rationally wouldn't invalidate the existence of an entity simply because we can't prove it. It's a hypothesis that is almost impossible to answer, and any good believer in science wouldn't draw up a conclusion from something in which our evidence for/against it is incomplete.

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            3 Replies
            • [quote]The Bible does not directly invalidate many popular scientific theories. So, why can't they coexist?[/quote]Because religion fails the scientific method.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              6 Replies
              • The science invalidates the bibles theories.

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                2 Replies
                • Thank you for being a rational member of your demographic.

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • People are stubborn* Fixd

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • [quote] scientists and Christians[/quote] Lel

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • Wow, finally another smart Christian

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                • TL;DR sum it up pls

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                  4 Replies
                  • Yes! Thank you for having sanity!

                    Posting in language:

                     

                    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                  • I'm both a scientist and a Christian.

                    Posting in language:

                     

                    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                    1 Reply
                    You are not allowed to view this content.
                    ;
                    preload icon
                    preload icon
                    preload icon