{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/28/2012 2:52:23 AM
39
The Screenshot bungie posted on the front page is from 2009
11-11-2009 at 13:37 ( 1:37 )
Seems legit
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dazarobbo Nope. [url=http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg843.imageshack.us%2Fimg843%2F3716%2Fthirdtimesthecharm.jpg]It's from May 15, 1700[/url].[/quote]Oh my gosh! Bungie is like the Templars! They have been planning this for over three hundred years!
-
, [Edited on 11.28.2012 10:02 AM PST]
-
They created it back in 09 and have been modifying it over time.
-
I really don't see why this is a surprise to anyone here. The Destiny logo can be dated all the way to Halo 3 through the bonus disk. That was 2007. Concept art is the first things to be made, content wise, in any project.
-
[url=http://www.bungie.net/News/Blog.aspx]Look at the last three questions in this mailsack.[/url] Something is in a beta.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dazarobbo Nope. [url=http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg843.imageshack.us%2Fimg843%2F3716%2Fthirdtimesthecharm.jpg]It's from May 15, 1700[/url]. It's trivial to change file metadata, so there's no reason Bungie couldn't have (especially when they know it's one of the first places people will look). Similarly, the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch_%28Unix%29]touch[/url] program is also the reason why academics cannot trust students when they claim they finished their work on time but couldn't submit it. Don't trust it.[/quote]But in this case, why wouldn't you? X/X/1700 is obviously bogus, but created in '09 and edited yesterday (presumably to clean it up for release and add the Bungie and Destiny watermarks) is completely plausible and absent contradictory evidence I don't see why you wouldn't, in this case, trust that info.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] David iZ Mental Funkbrotha being a 1337 haxor EXIF data people[/quote] Dis (Properties people)
-
How did you view the date at which the image was uploaded?[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dazarobbo [url=http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg843.imageshack.us%2Fimg843%2F3716%2Fthirdtimesthecharm.jpg]It's from May 15, 1700[/url].[/quote]Interesting. [Edited on 11.28.2012 7:51 AM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Jose291 By now, the game should be in beta testing, if that was the case. [/quote] Some parts have been beta tested by members of this community.
-
Was Photoshop CS6 even [i]available[/i] in 2009?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] dazarobbo Nope. [url=http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg843.imageshack.us%2Fimg843%2F3716%2Fthirdtimesthecharm.jpg]It's from May 15, 1700[/url]. It's trivial to change file metadata, so there's no reason Bungie couldn't have (especially when they know it's one of the first places people will look). Similarly, the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch_%28Unix%29]touch[/url] program is also the reason why academics cannot trust students when they claim they finished their work on time but couldn't submit it. Don't trust it.[/quote]A. I don't see a reason to criticize or dispute this finding, as it's highly likely this concept art WAS from 2009. B. I don't see a reason why this is a thread at all, mainly because of my assertion in A. ©
-
Nope. [url=http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fimg843.imageshack.us%2Fimg843%2F3716%2Fthirdtimesthecharm.jpg]It's from May 15, 1700[/url]. It's trivial to change file metadata, so there's no reason Bungie couldn't have (especially when they know it's one of the first places people will look). Similarly, the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touch_%28Unix%29]touch[/url] program is also the reason why academics cannot trust students when they claim they finished their work on time but couldn't submit it. Don't trust it.
-
That's pretty awesome.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] AH4L [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Jose291 By now, the game should be in beta testing, if that was the case. [/quote] I doubt it would be in Beta yet. Remember, we've still seen nothing 'official' about the game until this point... Bungie generally releases a teaser way out, like 2 years. My guess is 2014, which would put a beta test far away yet.[/quote] The contract says "the game is due 2013" so by now they should be in beta testing... Besides, I found all this info to suspicious...
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Jose291 By now, the game should be in beta testing, if that was the case. [/quote] I doubt it would be in Beta yet. Remember, we've still seen nothing 'official' about the game until this point... Bungie generally releases a teaser way out, like 2 years. My guess is 2014, which would put a beta test far away yet.
-
By now, the game should be in beta testing, if that was the case.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] MURDUR 587 Are you guys seriously this confused? When you download the image it says the date it was created on your computer, the same way it does with every other file.[/quote] Every image has EXIF data which cannot be modified, which shows its original creation date. The date showing in Windows Explorer is not what we're talking about.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Buggy Virus Makes sense, since it is concept art. It would make more sense that they have an alpha or an alpha at this point, since game studios generally don't spend all their time drawing. . .[/quote]Urk tweeted about playing the most recent build of the game at his home months ago, I bet it's way past the alpha stage.
-
Can I view that info on a mac?
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Buggy Virus Makes sense, since it is concept art. It would make more sense that they have an alpha or an alpha at this point, since game studios generally don't spend all their time drawing. . .[/quote] Right now the team at Bungie have just dropped their Pizzas, turned around and all said "Oh -blam!-..."
-
Hmmm interesting.. [Edited on 11.27.2012 7:21 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ankerd123 1337 OMG LEET OMGGGGGGGGGGGG[/quote]The date and time could also have been effortlessly edited.
-
Makes sense, since it is concept art. It would make more sense that they have an alpha or an alpha at this point, since game studios generally don't spend all their time drawing. . .
-
1337 OMG LEET OMGGGGGGGGGGGG
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Bob Bobinson Destiny's been in development since 2007. The fact that they have concept art from 2009 isn't difficult to believe.[/quote] we know this.
-
Destiny's been in development since 2007. The fact that they have concept art from 2009 isn't difficult to believe.
