{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by JDubsH:
12/21/2014 6:38:09 PM
4
30 dollars should be 50% more content
This isn't feedback, this is logic. If destiny costs $60, and the dlc cost around 30, shouldn't we feel like we are receiving around 50% more content? Destiny was a large game and required many hours to finish. I finished The Dark Below "storyline" in one night, in two hours.
While the engine Bungie created is great, the story and gameplay is simplistic and bafflingly small. And I would have expected that using the copy and paste method that is now so popular, we would at least have more content and hours of playing from the dlc. And no Bungie, grinding is not content. Grinding is necessary, but it does not substitute story and gameplay.
-
4 Replies$70 for the full game development earned bungies $500 million dollar investment back on day 1. There is most likely a much smaller percentage of people who bought the DLC than the full game, so the expected sales would be down and the price would have to generally scale from development costs, expected sales and profit requirements. Bungie still has to pay 500 developers to constantly work on the game, which are not cheap. To be honest I think $20 isn't bad and is a competitive DLC price given their expenses. That being said I haven't bought DLC.. Yet lol
-
The expansion isn't $30 though.
-
Where did you pay $30 for dlc? Dark Below was $20. If you're talking about the season pass, then you can't complain yet because House of Wolves isn't even out yet. As far as you know it will have 3x the content.
-
2 RepliesDestiny was a large game?
