What is this? One can't let the quality of a game be determined by democracy, that's ridiculous; the system is flawed. There are simply too many reasons for why it doesn't work, such as being able to vote/vote against without having played it, not having reference of what a specific game meant for its time, yet being able to vote for a game that resonates with ones [i]time[/i]. And how does the fact that one can vote against something in order for its competition to fair better, make the it worse? Example: someone who likes Marathon will vote for it and vote against Doom (its competitor), completely disregarding that Doom acted as a foundation, and that Marathon owes much its innovation to it. And the Doom devotees will do the opposite. It is now about who has the most fans. But it's just for [i]fun[/i] right, so no need to get worked up? [Edited on 11.17.2012 9:29 AM PST]