JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Halo

11/29/2012 12:41:23 PM
46

Who the Master Chief really is (MAJOR SPOILERS FOR H4 CAMPAIGN, BOOKS)

I saw this very interesting theory on the Halo subreddit, /r/halo. Note that this doesn't belong to me, I am merely sharing it. Enjoy. [quote]I have a theory, one that I've had for a very long time. Once Halo 4 was released, everything just supported my theory. Ahead, you will read a theory that is very likely to be possible, and true. Unless you possibly want to spoil Halo CE-Halo 6, then don't read. You have been warned. Alright, now that I said that, I'm going to state my conclusion first, then I'm going to give the evidence, I'm not much of a writer, so bear with me. Master Chief is Bornsteller. There. Thats my conclusion. Master Chief has Bornstellar's geas. For those who don't know, Bornstellar is the main character in Cryptum, and also..... the Didact. But not the Halo 4 Didact, that Didact is called the Ur-Didact. Halo 5 and 6 will be the rivalry between the Didact and Chief, and it's all being set up by the Forerunner Books. So..... heres my evidence. In the Forerunner Trilogy, the Didact meets Bornstellar when he's really young, and they travel across the galaxy doing stuff that doesnt matter to my theory. What matters, is that near the end, the Master Builder sentences the Didact to be killed, and Bornstellar doesnt see him after, at all. Bornstellar, who was given a "brevet mutation" by the Didact, starts mutating into the Didact himself, gaining all his memories, attitude, everything. He becomes what we call, the Bornstellar Didact. But, this is only because everyone believes the Ur-Didact(Original Didact) is dead. Bornstellar takes his place. In Silentium, the Ur-Didact returns, as he was dumped on a flood infested installation. We assume the 2 Didacts work together to fight the Flood. After this, nobody knows which Didact did what... was it the Ur-Didact who activated the rings and died, and Bornstellar was the one who used the composer and eventually exiled on Requiem? Or vice versa? I say...... On Requiem and the Halo 4 terminals, that was the Ur-Didact, and the Didact on the Halo 3 terminals, the one who activated the Rings, was Bornstellar. In the Ur-Didact's leave, The Bornstellar Didact fell in love with the Librarian, explaining his words to her in the terminals. Thats what I've established, and now that we have that done, lets explain the Geas.... Chakas had the Lord of Admiral's Geas, right? Well, thats just right. A lot of humans have geas, a command imposed on them, and some humans have personality imprints in them, which came from other humans or forerunners. Hell, the Librarian even programmed Geas' in many humans, and so their children's children's children eventually fulfill that command. Thats exactly what the Librarian did..... but I don't know how, yet, but Spartan Ops Episode 4 suggests she survived on Requiem, so she could've done it after. Somehow, after Bornstellar activated the Halo's, she took his imprint, and implanted it into one human, along with a geas. The geas/imprint was passed down from human to human, generation to generation for over 100,000 thousand years. That imprint/geas..... was passed to Chief. He has no idea. The Librarian says that he is meant to defeat the Didact, and everything has been planned, meaning that she could've set up thousands, maybe millions of geas' in the humans, each meant to help set up the Spartans, and the Chief. This is the quote, "Reclaimer, when I indexed mankind for repopulation, I hid seeds from the Didact. Seeds which would lead to an eventuality. Your physical evolution. Your combat skin. Even your ancilla, Cortana. You are the culmination of a thousand lifetimes of planning." The command imposed on the Chief is to defeat the Didact, and Bornstellar's imprint is on him. The Geas/imprint thing is more fully explained in the Forerunner Trilogy, mostly Primordium. Now how do I know he's Bornstellar? Well, lets look at the games.... Remember when 343 Guilty Spark started being Chief's enemy in Halo: CE? 343 says "Last time, you asked me, if it was my choice, would I do it? Having had considerable time to ponder your query, my answer has not changed. There is no choice. We must activate the ring." The Didact is the one who activated the Rings. Sure, Spark was rampant, but why else would he refer to the Chief as if he is the one activated the rings? This quote also indicates that Chakas/Spark was present when Didact activated the rings. Another quote, immediately after Cortana told Chief that Halo is a weapon, "More or less. Technically, this installation's pulse has a maximum effective radius of twenty-five thousand light years. But, once the others follow suit, this galaxy will be quite devoid of life, or at least any life with sufficient biomass to sustain the Flood. But you already knew that... I mean, how couldn't you?" How would Chief already know that? Only one reason. Bornstellar did. BWAAAM. So far, as evidence, is 343 Guilty Spark's words, the Librarians words, and so on. In H3 even, 343 said Chief was Forerunner. Also... Bornstellar can't just exist purely for the fact of making an excuse for the Ur-Didact surviving. From one view, 343 created Bornstellar because the Didact died firing the rings, yet they wanted Chief to fight the Didact. So they could've created him just to allow the Didacts survival. It can't be that simple. Bornstellar is the Protagonist for a reason. Its because he will eventually become the Chief. I have a feeling that over time...... I'll discover that I am right. The Didact will find out, and he will start hating Chief for it, if he doesnt already. The Reclaimer trilogy is the fight between the two Didact's. John 117 has the imprint of Bornstellar Makes Eternal Lasting in him. And he will find out soon. Thats my theory. Thoughts?[/quote] Here's the [url=http://www.reddit.com/r/halo/comments/13z7kt/who_master_chief_is_campaign_spoilers/]link[/url] to the original post so you can upvote this genius.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Yeah, me and a bunch of other people came to this conclusion a while back. Not so much as it being Bornstellar (Simply because the mention of the Ur-Didact surviving didn't come to light) as it was the Didact. It really all makes perfect sense.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Holy -blam!-! I think this is it, this guy is calling it right now, and I'm pretty sure he's right.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Many--me included--started having what's pretty much the same theory back when Halo 3 was released. With Cryptum it developed into more less what the quote in the OP implied.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Sounds good.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Interesting.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Huh. A crack-pot theory that actually makes perfect sense and that I find myself agreeing with.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • "John 117 has the imprint of Bornstellar Makes Eternal Lasting in him. And he will find out soon. Thats my theory. Thoughts?" I think thats why on the closing scene of Halo 4 they have Chief taking off his armor (Never a big focus in the books). They had so much focus on that, which I think means that he is about to find out about his imprint. Also I think this is why they try to keep his face hidden so much (aka. is actual body) maybe because of that mark.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] cgauthier7304 "John 117 has the imprint of Bornstellar Makes Eternal Lasting in him. And he will find out soon. Thats my theory. Thoughts?" I think thats why on the closing scene of Halo 4 they have Chief taking off his armor (Never a big focus in the books). They had so much focus on that, which I think means that he is about to find out about his imprint. Also I think this is why they try to keep his face hidden so much (aka. is actual body) maybe because of that mark.[/quote]the imprint is mental not physical, he wouldn't have an actual marking on him somewhere.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • . . . Jun?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I never thought of that before, but it makes perfect sense.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 0
    Hmm that is pretty interesting...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Chief iz Bornstellar. :o

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I got a big plot hole to this theory. Bornstellar Didact was the Halo 4 Didact as he had monstrous features that were due to his mutation being rushed. It states it in Crytum and even in the terminals. First few he he looks fine then in the middle of the terminals there's one were he has his ugly face on and asks a forerunner next to him if he would follow him even in this new form. Sorry but seems to me that that's the case.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Alfdog Bornstellar Didact was the Halo 4 Didact[/quote] Nope. It's the Ur-Didact in Halo 4, the Ur-Didact's features became hideous in the Terminals where he attempts to mutate himself into a form that is invulnerable to Flood infection but it fails, this happens [i]after[/i] his brevet-mutation on Bornstellar. Bornstellar-Didact is the one who fires the Rings, the Terminals make it abundantly clear that it's the Ur-Didact in Halo 4 and common sense essentially dictates it's him from his dialogue in the game. [Edited on 11.29.2012 2:48 PM PST]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ajw34307 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Alfdog Bornstellar Didact was the Halo 4 Didact[/quote] Nope. It's the Ur-Didact in Halo 4, the Ur-Didact's features became hideous in the Terminals where he attempts to mutate himself into a form that is invulnerable to Flood infection but it fails, this happens [i]after[/i] his brevet-mutation on Bornstellar. Bornstellar-Didact is the one who fires the Rings, the Terminals make it abundantly clear that it's the Ur-Didact in Halo 4 and common sense essentially dictates it's him from his dialogue in the game.[/quote] Can we be for certain though? Bornstellar would remark on how ugly he was himself in Crytum so he must of been one ugly son-of-a--blam!- and Halo 4's isn't exactly dreamy is he? And by dialogue in the game, why would he not verbally recycle the Ur-Didact veiws? They're virtually clones mentally as well as physically. Plus why would 343 not highlight the reason for why the Didact looks so monstrous. It only seemed to be a passing occurrence in the terminal. Maybe 343 didn't make it clear enough or we got two ugly sods that call themselves Didact but that's the way it seems to me.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • My only problem with this theory is that it completely ignores the Precursors' final test, which is what I always thought Librarian was referring too when she said she was preparing humanity for something. Unless the test is to pit the Forerunners against humanity. Either way I have no doubt Chief has the geas of a Didact. He definitely has one now, after Librarian mutated him. Hence the voice in his head. ^^Born's concerns over his appearance were there to portray his character, how he was so uneasy mutating to a form from a Rate so beneath his kind. In Primordium he seems more or less happy to see Chakas. He even saves his life. Born doesn't hate humans. Besides, the Terminals make it impossible for it to be Born. Nothing adds up considering the context of events, such as Born only being 12 years old, and the Didact in the Terminals being covered over thousands of years. That same Didact is the one that is imprisoned in the Cryptum, making it impossible for him to fire the Rings. [Edited on 11.29.2012 3:41 PM PST]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • He's John. It's implied the Didact we saw in Halo 4 was Bornstellar.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • That makes incredible sense. Now i'm just waiting for the day it's confirmed.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Ming blown. Thread saved. Seriously, this was pretty revelatory for me. Thanks for posting, OP!

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Am I the only one who would be incredibly pissed and disappointed if this were true? I'd stop reading the books, actually. I wouldn't give a -blam!- about the canon anymore.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Well, that's cool. Maybe I should read those new books... I stopped after Contact Harvest. I met Staten at ComicCon that year along with Nyland. Ahhh, the good ol' days.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Amazing theory, and I [i]would[/i] completely agree... If it weren't for the fact we all know who the Chief [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAOo8nE8_Jg&t=0m37s]really is[/url] [Edited on 11.29.2012 4:41 PM PST]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Pokezilla Linked Am I the only one who would be incredibly pissed and disappointed if this were true? I'd stop reading the books, actually. I wouldn't give a -blam!- about the canon anymore.[/quote] You serious? This would be awesome. It would finally give relevance to 343GS's weird comments in the first game.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] cgauthier7304 "John 117 has the imprint of Bornstellar Makes Eternal Lasting in him. And he will find out soon. Thats my theory. Thoughts?" I think thats why on the closing scene of Halo 4 they have Chief taking off his armor (Never a big focus in the books). They had so much focus on that, which I think means that he is about to find out about his imprint. Also I think this is why they try to keep his face hidden so much (aka. is actual body) maybe because of that mark.[/quote] lolno

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Yeah sorry but, chief is chief to me, he isn't some stupid forerunner from the expanded universe. I am going to get bashed horribly for this but that's just my opinion. I am sure Bungie intended him to be just that as well.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm completely lost on which side I should take. Ur-Didact seems like the obvious culprit for using the Composer but Bornstellar heard from the Primordial and may have even believed himself to be the original. Nonetheless, that sounds like it would turn out great.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

1 2
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon