JavaScript is required to use

原先發佈於:TFS The Floods Sanctuary
由risay_117編輯: 9/22/2013 6:56:48 PM

9 Principles of Policing

[u][b]The 9 Principles of Modern Policing[/b][/u] [quote] 1. The basic mission for which the police exist is to prevent crime and disorder. 2.The ability of the police to perform their duties is dependent upon the public approval of police actions. 3.Police must secure the willing co-operation of the public in voluntary observation of the law to be able to secure and maintain the respect of the public. 4.The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force. 5.Police seek and preserve public favour not by catering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolute impartial service to the law. 6.Police use physical force to the extent necessary to secure observance of the law or to restore order only when the exercise of persuasion, advice, and warning is found to be insufficient. 7.Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence. 8.Police should always direct their action strictly towards their functions, and never appear to usurp the powers of the judiciary. 9.The test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with it.[/quote] These are the 9 main principles of policing created by Robert Peel for modern policing. Thus if this is the basis on which modern policing was established upon why are they not followed and if they are how are they being followed? Personally i believe the main problem is the division in police in understanding that they are the public and the public are them. Yet at the same time one wonders whether the police are able to justify increased wage if no crime is visible. How does an officer justify it, considering according to the 9th principle the absence of crime and order means they are doing their job, but the act of them doing their job shows they are not up to par. This although i support heavily hurts the police when economic policy are to take place, considering that when no crimes exist people believe either the cops are not doing their jobs or it is time funding cuts. Another thing of great interest for me personally was this:[i]The degree of co-operation of the public that can be secured diminishes proportionately to the necessity of the use of physical force.[/i] For a some reason it rings quite true and may actually represent the main problem in the US police force within the lower income suburbs in America. This sadly causes the cops to lose the cooperation of the public in turn, as well as the public approval. So anyway how do you view Peeling's 9 Principles of Policing. Are they true and how do you see your community cops or police in relation to these principles. Do they uphold them or do they not?



以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

preload icon
preload icon
preload icon