War is a constant

That pistol in the OP packs a punch. I didn't know they had shell-based payloads.

If i would rule a great army with an army bigger the usa and rusia i would wage war on the whole world and in the end all others unite and ill die so heres world peace

If our nature as humans no longer caused war, if I could end war: [spoiler]> Simulated in real-time battlefields, using real terrain, but digital weaponry. > Each victory/loss in these simulated conflicts would impact on politics and other things. > Nobody dies; war is simulated, a video-game worked on consistently by everyone in some way. > 3rd-world countries get technologies, situations resolved. > Peace ensues, as the outlet for violence is now digital and influential. > Other developments, such as exploring the unexplored, become more higher priority, along with portals, space travel, and abandoning petroleum for more sustainable sources of energy. > Power (rights, etc...) becomes more flexible and manageable, whilst granting people the ability to impact and change, with rules keeping it beneficial to the majority. > Is possible, if we build robots with reasonable thinking and ability, that the machines would do what I just said in greentext.[/spoiler]

[i]There can be only one.[/i] War will only end when there is one survivor of it.

Only the dead know the end of war.

I think the leaders of countries should fight each other to decide problems or at least be on the front lines. A lot of wars would be avoided if people saw the consequences of their actions.

When someone reaches the score limit.

All problems should be solved by children's card games like in Yugioh.

When I Trickshot last....

I could honestly see stuff being settled through sport.

The only way for man to unite would be the introduction of a common enemy. Even then, that would only start a new, bloodier war. You cannot end war. It is in our very nature as aggressive creatures.