JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

雜七雜八

瀏覽大量隨機討論串。
由Dustin Returns編輯: 11/13/2014 12:16:36 AM
176

"God cannot be proven" - The atheist logical fallacy

God has already been proven and in a number of ways. Perhaps the most compelling of which is the creation argument. Why do we have something rather than nothing? That question cannot be answered without first disregarding our most basic laws of physics. Essentially, only a God like being (or act) could get us a universe from nothing. And there you have it: proof of God. Now watch as atheists continue to deny God even as the proof sits right in front of them.

文章張貼語言:

 

以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

檢視完整主題
  • 由John Doe編輯: 11/18/2014 2:47:35 AM
    There's a great book you should read "Think" by Simon Blackburn He has a chapter he dedicates to analyzing the various arguments for the existence of God. The Cosmological Argument contradicts itself, and the other have various other flaws. I don't have the time to type it all up, but just in case you actually care. To address your particular argument, you claim that everything has a cause, so there must be an [i]original[/i] cause. The flaw here is that by conceding that God is the origin and has no causation for [i]his[/i] existence, you can no longer make the initial argument regarding causation therefore the universe would [i]not[/i] require an original cause.

    文章張貼語言:

     

    以禮待人。發佈文章前請花點時間查看我們的行為準則 取消 編輯 創立火力戰隊 文章

    7 回覆
    你無權檢閱此內容
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon