^
I really can't decide. They are all great in their own way.
What about you?
Who's your favorite and why?
-
I’m in the minority here but I really liked Andrew Garfield. It’s hard to say which is better because I think both Andrew and Tom brought something exceptional to the role. I think a lot of it too has to do with scripts, setting and what we’re used to at the time. Now Toby MacQuire’s Aunt May takes the trophy for authenticity where Tom Holland’s Aunt May takes the trophy for Aunt I’d hook up with.
-
1 回覆
-
Spider man, spider man He can do whatever a spider can But what does it take to be a good one If drawn in ink, then none But if instead it’s courage and heart Then Tom Holland has the part For he’s got what it takes to be that man Who can do whatever a spider can.
-
Yeah Andrew Garfield was great because of the way he had hair and looked like Spiderman. I really liked his parts that involved him staring silently. He nailed it brilliantly. I will admit I'm not a huge fan of his speaking lines, or his action scenes, or really any of his character development, but I gotta say, 10/10 for the hair. Well done Andrew Garfield I gotta give credit where credit is due, truly amazing hair.
-
Maquire makes for a better Spiderman but Holland makes for a better (and more relatable) Peter Parker. Holland also has better humor and isn't too bad at Spiderman himself, so I'd say he's the best pick overall. Never watched either Amazing Spiderman movies so I have no opinion of Garfield.
-