Feudalist. The clue is in the name "Monarchy"

It's not feudalist at all. Not every monarchy is feudalistic or do you see the brits working the fields for a bunch of nobles?

Modern Britain is a democracy with the queen as a head of state with no "real" power. The Monarch hasn't called the shots in Britain since Cromwell took over (although the Monarchs power started to dwindle after the signing of the manga carta). But before that when Britain was a feudalist society we were all out working in fields. Germany had a Monarch until (roughly) the end of WW1 they were "replaced" by a well known Facist. Fascism is (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practices. More like some other world "leaders" who may just be coming into power in a country with no Monarch in place (I'm referring to Trump if you hadn't guessed). But then you probably knew all that and were just trolling. Good job!

Uuh friend. I hate to break it to ya but you really need to do your research a taaad bit better. The united kingdom is a constitutional monarchy and I do know everything you said, except that your basic thesis makes it all irrelevant. A monarchy can also be a democracy as you can witness in almost all modern nations that retained their kings/queens (let's not trigger anyone) mostly for representative reasons. Monarchies have been a political concept that has been around much much longer than the ~1000 years than the concept of Feudalism was around. I referred to NM as a fascist party because that's what it will most likely end up as, when a party basically smashes a parliament and installs an absolute leader with power over all. Often this process is accompanied by troubled and dangerous times for a people as is the case here. Just look at some European history and all the signs will be there. Also just to add a little something: After WW1 Germany first off became a Republic, with the more moderate ruling parties struggling to keep the more extreme left and right wing parties in check (Spartacus rebellion and Kapp Putsch), after showing signs of getting better (to no small part thanks to Gustav Stresemann) an economic crisis and fear of communism did Germany in...whereas the [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] party didn't win the elections but came close enough for the elderly President of Germany to pick a certain Adolf Hitler as chancellor...and the rest is history.

Firstly, let me apologise. As someone who lives in the UK I am fully aware we are a constitutional monarchy. My error was in assuming you were younger/less informed so I "dumbed it down". My bad! Secondly; you refer to them as fascist because "that's how they'll end up" (paraphrasing). So you're calling them something now based on your opinion of how the future will go. Talk about an irrelevant argument. Lastly, I have a. sociology degree not a history one. I tip my hat to your historical knowledge. I do however maintain you are still completely wrong in calling NM either a communist or fascist party.

Thank you very much. But eitherway I was mostly jokingly referring to New Monarchy as a fascist party, as the op first of all referred to them as a communist party in his attempt to make the fwc appealing. So in that spirit I called them fascist as calling them communist would just be absurd. But eitherway you're rightfully pointing out that the criteria I used are not sufficient to call a political group fascist.

Wow. This has been a genuine pleasure. A sensible debate on Destiny forums where no one has resorted to name calling. You sir/madam (not assuming gender) are a star. I tip my cap to thee.