Four things. 1. You don't understand what "nationality" means. Minorities aren't separate nationalities. 2. What you've described is the relative superiority of a school system that is based on teaching differing beliefs and opinions. You mentioned how locking different ethnic people out by language causes polarization. Having schools that are based on differing beliefs inherently encourages those differences and widens the gap between groups. You are arguing for a polarized education system by badmouthing a polarized education system for being polarized. 3. You act as if our current public education system is the only possible system that could exist and therefore, if it is bad, public education systems as a whole are bad. This is characteristically false. 4. You don't seem to understand what is/should be the point of a public education. [u]If[/u] a system is comparable to all the things you attempted to compare it to (news, etc) then it has failed its own purpose. An education system should be designed to help the mental development of children and young adults so that they have the tools to think critically and the basic understanding of a variety of things they might need for the future. This is why we teach communication, mathematics, the sciences. History classes help to put contextual understanding of the human existence, but I'd argue that it is of secondary importance, personally. What an education system [i]shouldn't[/i] do is teach things that are not generally true. Beliefs and opinions should have no place. The capacity for disagreement between the teachings of one school and the teachings of another should not exist. So [u]if[/u] the system can be compared to the news as you have attempted it, the system itself needs to be revolutionized. You have said nothing of the inherent quality of a public education system.