{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/16/2015 6:29:25 PM
11
The court found him not guilty, what makes you think you know better? Not trying to come across as a dick or a heartless bastard but, so many women are quick to cry -blam!- when there's some money to be made. Or in this case maybe she was just jealous because a multi millionaire slept with her friend instead of her?
English
-
Edited by BiG SH0T ROB: 12/16/2015 6:41:29 PM18. A Teen. Like i stated in OP: what if this was your daughter? The question is rhetorical. You know what you would do. What makes me think i know better? Read the article. There is obviously something else going on here. [quote]During the trial, Judge Martin Griffiths permitted the rare step of allowing 20 minutes of Abdulaziz's evidence to be heard in private [/quote] This was not a normal verdict. This is corruption.
-
Legal age of consent in the UK is 16. It says "rare", means it isn't exactly the first time a judge has allowed something like this. If this was my daughter, sister or whatever, I'd be more concerned that she's out getting shit faced and going home with strange men just because they've got a bit of money.
-
Edited by Psyntifik: 12/16/2015 6:44:27 PM[quote]What if this was your daughter?[/quote] This is exactly why it wasn't the judges daughter. Evidence would be dismissed and he would go to jail even if he's innocent.
-
But the evidence WAS dismissed! That is the whole point man. The medical examiner has found irrefutable proof of this man's DNA inside the little girls vagina. The man does not deny entering her. He rather chose to explain it by saying he "fell on top of her" A ridiculous, outrageous excuse. Come on man. This case is as clear as day.
-
I dunno, I find the whole article to be a little biased.
-
It is one article, from one news outlet. There are dozens of other articles from different outlets and they all confirm the story.
-
And apparently she pulled him in. Who am I to say who is telling the truth? Fortunately, that's why we have lawyers and courts.
-
Edited by BiG SH0T ROB: 12/16/2015 9:20:09 PMOkay so now you are creating a new story and a new reality. Here are the facts: [quote] The medical examiner has found irrefutable proof of this man's DNA inside the little girls vagina. [/quote] She is an 18 year old child. He is 46. [u][b]He does not deny entering her vagina[/b][/u] She says R A P E He says: "I tripped, fell and landed with my penis inside her vagina" Frankly i don't think you are much of a man if you still try to defend this individual when you know the facts. I'm just going to assume you are trolling me at this point. I enjoy online arguements though, so the joke is on you ;)
-
Edited by Psyntifik: 12/16/2015 9:20:37 PMLol! He tripped and fell. It happens. Is he telling the truth? I don't know. It's right there that she pulled him in after he fell. But why should I believe her over him? Especially after the recent Stoya story. I'm not defending anyone, but I'm just not jumping on the whole "it must be assault!"
-
Woah woah.. what happened with that story?? I remember reading that a pornstar said she was abused. That all turned out to be lie then?
-
Of course it was a lie. A mutual friend even said it was a lie, but she wanted to defend Stoya because "women need to be listened to when they cry assault"... Such bullshit.
