I suppose if all you care about is what's statistically the best then sure, but some of us play for fun or for how things feel.
English
-
Edited by IDicebergEGO82: 9/7/2022 3:46:48 PMWell if someone hasn’t said it clearly enough warlocks are no longer “fun” but to play. 2 out of 4 classes are utter dog - Blam!-
-
Fun is subjective. Personally for me the only Warlock class I had fun with pre light 3.0 was voidwalker. Post 3.0 I enjoy all light classes. Still meh about stasis lock though.
-
and thats cool and all. but it's not viable outside of trash content and that's a problem. same thing with solar lock if youre not using well. warlocks got straightup nerfed 2 seasons in a row
-
I'm pretty sure all subclasses are viable up to legend content which imo is the bar that should be met. Expecting everything to be equal at GM levels is a bit much.
-
also, your point makes 0 sense. i can walk around legend content with blues and terrible stats. that isnt the definition of viable. the definition of viable is whether or not youd be better using literally anything else at a level of content that is difficult for the individual
-
stormtrance does less dps than a 140 hc. chaos reach with geos does less dps than a linear. there's no survivability on arc warlock like there is for arc hunters and arc titans and void lock and solar lock. daybreak bottom tree got gutted, cant use it in pve anymore
-
The power of arc Lock specifically is in it's neutral game. And you should be blinding people often enough with builds to survive decently.
-
its worse than shooting a gun. there is 0 value
-
I don't discuss with people -blam!- to such extremes. So good day.
-
its okay, you're just wrong lol. objectively, factually, wrong.