Oh yay. More random crap that holds no relation to the lore outside of some false, perceived reality.
English
-
And unsolicited insults that are more nonsensical than any creative exposition the OP has ever written. It's a video game... it's not real. Are you that malformed that you can't understand that others can enjoy, a video game - that is not REAL... in a creative way? But something compels you to invade that with blatant acrimony. AND... you call the OP crazy... "schizo"? You're projecting. It's sad.
-
I’m calling out that which is disingenuous. The implications of this is that they are true, and while I’m by no means being virtuous, at least I’m not trying to trick and deceive. Furthermore, I’m giving yall exactly what you want. You feed of the bad publicity, because all it is to you is publicity, otheriwse, you would have stopped much sooner rather than later. Lastly, if it’s a discussion or theory to support some claim you have, why then, can you not take criticism and critique? Should opposition prove the theory wrong, why do you lack the capacity to understand that? Is it simply that you do not care. If so, state that what you write is Fanfiction and nothing else. A head cannon that you like to believe but isn’t true. If it is a genuine theory, my previous questions stand. It’s bordering Insanity, and while it doesn’t excuse my insults, it does give you the air of “crazy”. Alas, I guess I’m just a mean spirited person.
-
You're so broken.
-
And is that all you could respond with. Do you genuinely have no counter to the points I laid out. I recognize that what I do is all in a mean spirit, and I’m not going to forgive for that unless it’s something I view as genuinely harmful. I have proven as such beforehand. It’s just funny to me is all.
-
You didn't make any points. You don't have any merit.
-
Stool’s proven you wrong plenty of times already. If you didn’t have your head up your own -blam!- all the time, you would’ve already noticed his merit! HAHAH!
-
But I did. 1. The posts you make are disingenuous. Is this false, is this true? You make no counter. 2. I give yall the publicity you want. 3. I point out the fact that you can’t take critique. None of these points have been countered, rather, you pull recognition toward my insults, which I do acknowledge, despite not countering.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika jhermannITJ: 9/6/2024 1:10:54 AM[i]"[b][u]The tu quoque fallacy[/u][/b] Rather than coming up with a valid counterargument, those using the tu quoque fallacy invalidate their opponent's criticisms by addressing them with another criticism. With this kind of argument, you find a way to attack your opponent instead of coming up with a logical reason to argue against their original claim".[/i] 😇 👍💠 And what you responded to the OP with: [i]"[b][u]Ad hominem fallacy[/u][/b] (or ad hominem) is an attempt to discredit someone’s argument by personally attacking them. Instead of discussing the argument itself, criticism is directed toward the opponent’s character, which is irrelevant to the discussion. Ad hominem fallacy is often used as a diversion tactic to shift attention to an unrelated point like a person’s character or motives and avoid addressing the actual issue. It is common in both formal and informal contexts, ranging from political debates to online discussions".[/i]
-
And you all make use of Convoluted logic. You try and lose track of your audience so as to keep them from disproving you. If a person can’t possibly understand what your trying to say, and you make it to complicated for them to get such a sense, then by all means, how are they supposed to draw upon the lore to argue against you. It’s also why your posts end up being entirely too long, which wouldn’t be an issue had you not been using convoluted logic. Hard to read, hard to counter. This applies to the two of you.
-
Recognition take knowledge
-
What a convoluted expression of the "Pee Wee Herman" defense avoiding accountability for your toxic weirdness, "I know you are, but what am I"? Lame AF.
-
[quote]What a convoluted expression of the "Pee Wee Herman" defense avoiding accountability for your toxic weirdness, "I know you are, but what am I"? Lame AF.[/quote] Toxic weirdness is deliberately misleading people and telling people who not to listen to because they disprove your ideas.
-
Edytowany przez użytkownika BarStool: 9/6/2024 1:00:17 AMWell, there is a level of truth to it. Personal experience defines knowledge, so you either must have known someone just as broken as I, which is unlikely, or you yourself must be as broken as I am. I would like to think the latter is true, otherwise that’s sad. And what I said didn’t deny that I was broken. It simply said that to recognize broken, you yourself must be broken.