{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Sturm with no Drang:
9/20/2018 2:44:17 AM
5
As much as I am open to more options, this one in particular leaves me on the fence.
Having no helmet on during combat breaks the immersion, but I also imagine that the devs would probably have to compensate for it by adding facial expressions for being hurt/damaged.
That is unless, of course, if folks are content with their character having a perpetually static facial expression 24/7.
I’m not against having the option open either, but I personally would never use it.
English
-
You wouldn't even see your face to notice any expressions. The only way you could see the front of your face is if you did a quick emote and spun the camera, which would break whatever expression you had (or make your emote look really weird).
-
You can always still have your helmet on during combat if you want but for the players who dont want it on they don't have to have it on
-
i don't see how it can breaks your immersion since every major character in cut-scene is helmet-less, plus its an option, you have the choice to not use it. as for character animations; there are already lots of facial expressions implanted in the game because of the emotes so i don't think it would be complicated.
-
Our character’s faces still remain static for emotes, I thought?
-
yea, you are right. but still im ok with that even in action.
