JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

5/19/2016 4:01:45 PM
3
Biology will tell you that sexual reproduction between mammals is only possible between opposite sexes, i.e the only way to further your species is to have babies. So really. If one is going to justify a biologically deviant behavior that, if normal, would result in the extinction of that species, by appealing to Science, or supposedly erotic behavior in the animal kingdom, I beg to differ. The only argument for homosexuality that is passable is "well it just feels right to me because I'm attracted to it". That raises the whole issue of morality however. Is it what you make it? And if so, why would same sex be okay, but not -blam!- little dead corpses? What is the authority here? Something to think about.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • It is normal. It's practiced in over 1600 known species. Humans being gay won't destroy anything. There are ways to make babies other than traditional sex.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Disregarding the fact you don't provide any evidence for said 1600 species, and disregarding the fact that it is your only say-so that somehow we can make babies differently, disregarding the fact you did not answer my question, and disregarding the fact you have yet to provide a sound authority for your claims, and disregarding the fact you have not answered the morality issue, Who said? I'm curious on what authority you are using to justify the opinionated notion based somehow on "scientific studies" that sexuality is this grey zone of weird whatever. Again, I can only conclude that you are using what you arbitrarily consider to be as erotic behavior in the animal kingdom as flimsy justification for your beliefs. And really. Other ways to make babies? Like adoption? Which still requires a man and woman to create the child in the first place? Or some odd medical experiment? This all still begging the question of who said. Opinions are great. Have yours. But if you try to justify a belief based purely on what you personally and arbitrarily perceive to be true, well, we might have a problem.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by LiamCDM: 5/19/2016 6:54:42 PM
    [quote]Disregarding the fact you don't provide any evidence for said 1600 species[/quote]You could've looked it up but here you go. http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/1500-animal-species-practice-homosexuality.aspx [quote]ct you have not answered the morality issue[/quote]What do you mean by morality? Being a bigot in the name of God isn't being "moral" it's being a dick. [quote]nd really. Other ways to make babies?[/quote]In vitro fertilization. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/science-in-transition-understanding-the-biology-behind-gender-identity/article25553156/

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon