Young children are so impressionable nowadays and I fear that many of them will play this game. Let's consider the idea of personal roles in killing other sentient beings.
To kids, virtual experiences feel very real, not only because the graphics today are so amazing, but because they are taking on a first-person role in the killing process. Rather than just passively watching a rated-R violent movie, when kids play a game, they are one of the main characters inside the adventure. The entire experience becomes a more meaningful -- and deadly - in their brains, which are forming new connections every day. The other issue is that children will play a game where they mostly resolve conflicts through violence. Violent video games show kids how to express themselves physically, in a violent way.
It's already way easier for a child to push another child when they're angry than to express their emotions and resolve a conflict through words. When you hear the tragic, heart-wrenching stories such as what happened in Newtown, CT, you wonder how exposure to violent games de-sensitizes people to the act of killing other people. What if that could carry over to their own life or others?
The very possibility of creating sociopathic tendencies is something that should be avoided, not created. It also exposes children to possible instances of explicit languages which might shatter and destroy their youthful innocence. It's all about that confusion between reality and fantasy that may be difficult for a young person like that to see and understand.
Is that what we really want to expose children to? Is that the sort of thing we want to promote?
I propose the following and simple solution:
Destiny checks the birthday of the user's account If it is less than 13, then that account will not be able to play until that user's 13th birthday has been reached as the game is rated T for teen and no one younger, lest their young and impressionable minds be exposed to the horrors that might push them over the edge.
I personally believe that this is the best means to protect a growing new generation from sinking into sin and violence.
Let me also present a legitimate and completely trustworthy source free of any bias:
[url=http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/09/12/training-simulation-mass-killers-often-share-obsession-with-violent-video-games/]Fox News[/url]
I have created a poll to provide a means to look at the responses of the thread at a glance, making it easier for discussion to be facilitated. Thank you for reading.
-
Never mind the effects on the children's young impressional minds!! Have you heard some of the foul language used by most young players? If they were mature enough they would think about toning it down a bit rather than telling you to #/!? off grandad.I paid 4 this game myself it wasn't bought me by mummy and daddy so the mute button is handy lol Most adult's tone their language down when you ask politely. Naturally not all kids are like that and to be honest that's why I wouldn't let my 14 year old be in the same room while I'm playing with a group let alone play online. Why should bungie shell out for the stupidity of some parents inability to educate their children on the LAW. If you put an age restriction then they will always find a way around it eg: Facebook, how many are over 16 ? There is no simple solution and game developers shouldn't have to play nanny to these people. Besides if ever the vex,fallen or hive arrive here one day,I shall personally dedicate a committee for the liberation and integration of terrifying organisms and their rehabilitation into society in your name lol seriously though,if your that concerned about children's welfare go and volunteer to help the ones getting murdered in the middle east. I'm sure their biggest concern is a video game.
-
1 답변Tell you what. I'll parent my kid because its my Job and its Not Bungies or Activisions.
-
Kids have cops and robbers and Indians and cowboys for a long time now. And log before that they were already preparing to be hunters at that age. Besides destiny is one of the non-gory, non-vulgar games, I let my 4 year old and my 9 year old play, and my 9 year old can solo his way to crota and is a boss with the relic in VOG.
-
It's rated teen, destiny is better than call of duty. I understand not wanting to play with them plus it makes crucible pretty easy when everyone in the lobby is a little kid. Besides you can't just kick someone out of a game if they paid
-
Checking the age on the account won't work because if you are under 12 you probably don't have one, it was setup by a parent. For the handful that do, they are likely smart enough to lie about their age to play the games they want. As a parent I feel it wise to consider no two kids are the same, and it's up to the parent to decide why their child is mature enough for. One of my raiding buddies is a ten year old, he's not quite mature enough to play unsupervised so his dad is always their raiding with him, and his account is set to hear friends list only with the dad screening friends. Parenting, because the world won't do it for you, don't expect Bungie too
-
1 답변작성자: FIRE WRAITH 01 4/12/2015 3:13:34 AMYou never watched classic Disney cartoons as a child did you? . . . . . I like that last tag you used.
-
2 답변작성자: Sora Orth 4/12/2015 4:31:49 AM[quote]Let me also present a legitimate and completely trustworthy source free of any bias: [url=http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/09/12/training-simulation-mass-killers-often-share-obsession-with-violent-video-games/]Fox News[/url][/quote] Lmao your dense if you think fox news is trustworthy source and has no bias claims, this invalidates your entire case here And if it actual does (and it has [i]never[/i] been 100% proven) it the parents fault for not monitoring there child, it's the parents choice to buy the game for them, all resposablitys for it falls on them, game devs shouldn't have do anything.